A universe field theory for JT gravity
Open accessAbstract
We present a field theory description for the non-perturbative splitting and joining of baby universes in Euclidean Jackiw-Teitelboim (JT) gravity. We show how the gravitational path integral, defined as a sum over topologies, can be reproduced from the perturbative expansion of a Kodaira-Spencer (KS) field theory for the complex structure deformations of the spectral curve. We use that the Schwinger-Dyson equations for the KS theory can be mapped to the topological recursion relations. We refer to this dual description of JT gravity as a ‘universe field theory’. By introducing non-compact D-branes in the target space geometry, we can probe non-perturbative aspects of JT gravity. The relevant operators are obtained through a modification of the JT path integral with Neumann boundary conditions. The KS/JT identification suggests that the ensemble average for JT gravity can be understood in terms of a more standard open/closed duality in topological string theory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A concrete description in which multi-universe phenomena are captured in JT gravity is in terms of Kodaira-Spencer theory.
“A concrete description in which such multi-universe phenomena are captured in JT gravity is in terms of Kodaira–Spencer theory.”
From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Post et al. (2022)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 88 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Post, B., van der Heijden, J., & Verlinde, E.
- Affiliations
- Institute for Theoretical Physics Amsterdam (NL)
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2022-05-18
- Volume
- 2022
- Issue
- 5
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4225602287
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (FP7 2007-2013)
- H2020 European Research Council (834878)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, baby universes, spectral curves, complex structure deformations, topological recursion, Dyson-Schwinger equations, gravitational path integral, Neumann boundary conditions, open-closed duality, topological string theory, two-dimensional quantum gravity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review