Cited by 24Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum chaos and dynamical systems

A one-loop test of the near-AdS2/near-CFT1 correspondence

Open access
Charles, Anthony M., Larsen, Finn·2020·Journal of High Energy Physics

Abstract

We analyze quantum fluctuations around black hole solutions to the Jackiw-Teitelboim model. We use harmonic analysis on Euclidean AdS 2 to show that the logarithmic corrections to the partition function are determined entirely by quadratic holomorphic differentials, even when conformal symmetry is broken and harmonic modes are no longer true zero modes. Our quantum-corrected partition function agrees precisely with the SYK result. We argue that our effective quantum field theory methods and results generalize to other theories of two-dimensional dilaton gravity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep07(2020)186

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A derivation by Charles and Larsen makes the relation between the boundary Schwarzian and bulk metric fluctuations more transparent.

    “There is a derivation of the path integral at the one-loop level performed by Charles and Larsen (2020) that makes the relation between the boundary Schwarzian and bulk metric fluctuations more transparent.”

    From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Charles and Larsen 2020

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 79 · Cited by 24

Authors
Charles, A. M., & Larsen, F.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Charles, Anthony M.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2020-07
Volume
2020
Issue
7
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2967671500
Cited by
24
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0007859)
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G.001.12)
  • KU Leuven (ZKD1118 C16/16/005, C16/16/005, C1-grant)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (616732)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
Keywords
Jackiw-Teitelboim model, AdS2/CFT1 correspondence, black holes, quantum fluctuations, conformal symmetry breaking, two-dimensional dilaton gravity, SYK model, one-loop effective action

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review