The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What is the simplest quantum field theory?
Open accessAbstract
Conventional wisdom says that the simpler the Lagrangian of a theory the simpler its perturbation theory. An ever-increasing understanding of the structure of scattering amplitudes has however been pointing to the opposite conclusion. At tree level, the BCFW recursion relations that completely determine the S-matrix are valid not for scalar theories but for gauge theories and gravity, with gravitational amplitudes exhibiting the best UV behavior at infinite complex momentum. At 1-loop, amplitudes in $ \mathcal{N} = 4 $ SYM only have scalar box integrals, and it was recently conjectured that the same property holds for $ \mathcal{N} = 8 $ SUGRA, which plays an important role in the suspicion that this theory may be finite. In this paper we explore and extend the S-matrix paradigm, and suggest that $ \mathcal{N} = 8 $ SUGRA has the simplest scattering amplitudes in four dimensions. Labeling external states by supercharge eigenstates-Grassmann coherent states-allows the amplitudes to be exposed as completely smooth objects, with the action of SUSY manifest. We show that under the natural supersymmetric extension of the BCFW deformation of momenta, all tree amplitudes in $ \mathcal{N} = 4 $ SYM and $ \mathcal{N} = 8 $ SUGRA vanish at infinite complex momentum, and can therefore be determined by recursion relations. An important difference between $ \mathcal{N} = 8 $ SUGRA and $ \mathcal{N} = 4 $ SYM is that the massless S-matrix is defined everywhere on moduli space, and is acted on by a non-linearly realized E7(7) symmetry. We elucidate how non-linearly realized symmetries are reflected in the more familiar setting of pion scattering amplitudes, and go on to identify the action of E7(7) on amplitudes in $ \mathcal{N} = 8 $ SUGRA. Moving beyond tree level, we give a simple general discussion of the structure of 1-loop amplitudes in any QFT, in close parallel to recent work of Forde, showing that the coefficients of scalar “triangle” and “bubble” integrals are determined by the “pole at infinite momentum” of products of tree amplitudes appearing in cuts. In $ \mathcal{N} = 4 $ SYM and $ \mathcal{N} = 8 $ SUGRA, the on-shell superspace makes it easy to compute the multiplet sums that arise in these cuts by relating them to the best behaved tree amplitudes of highest spin, leading to a straightforward proof of the absence of triangles and bubbles at 1-loop. We also argue that rational terms are absent. This establishes that 1-loop amplitudes in $ \mathcal{N} = 8 $ SUGRA only have scalar box integrals. We give an explicit expression for 1-loop amplitudes for both $ \mathcal{N} = 4 $ SYM and $ \mathcal{N} = 8 $ SUGRA in terms of tree amplitudes that can be determined recursively. These amplitudes satisfy further relations in $ \mathcal{N} = 8 $ SUGRA that are absent in $ \mathcal{N} = 4 $ SYM. Since both tree and 1-loop amplitudes for maximally supersymmetric theories can be completely determined by their leading singularities, it is natural to conjecture that this property holds to all orders of perturbation theory. This is the nicest analytic structure amplitudes could possibly have, and if true, would directly imply the perturbative finiteness of $ \mathcal{N} = 8 $ SUGRA. All these remarkable properties of scattering amplitudes call for an explanation in terms of a “weak-weak” dual formulation of QFT, a holographic dual of flat space.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The large $N$ limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity
Maldacena, J. (1998) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.1998.v2.n2.a1 · Cited by 14,524
The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and SupergravityPreprint
Maldacena, J. (1998) · Cited by 11,886
Weinberg, S. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139644174 · Cited by 4,377
Weinberg, S. (1995) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139644167 · Cited by 2,842
Weinberg, S. (1966) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.17.616 · Cited by 1,739
Supergravity in theory in 11 dimensions
Cremmer, E., Julia, B., & Scherk, J. (1978) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90894-8 · Cited by 1,602
Cremmer, E., & Julia, B. (1979) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90331-6 · Cited by 1,395
A relation between tree amplitudes of closed and open strings
Kawai, H., Lewellen, D. C., & Tye, S.-H. H. (1986) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90362-7 · Cited by 1,293
Singularities and Discontinuities of Feynman Amplitudes
Cutkosky, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1703676 · Cited by 1,195
New relations for gauge-theory amplitudes
Zvi Bern, A., Carrasco, J. J. M., & Johansson, H. (2008) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.085011 · Cited by 1,160
Cited by
Grassmannian Geometry of Scattering Amplitudes
Arkani-Hamed, N., Bourjaily, J., Cachazo, F., Goncharov, A., Postnikov, A., & Trnka, J. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316091548 · Cited by 432
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Arkani-Hamed, N., Cachazo, F., & Kaplan, J.
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 2010
- Issue
- 9
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070092470
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 31.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What is the simplest quantum field theory? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/jhep09(2010)016
- The paper
- Arkani-Hamed, N., Cachazo, F., & Kaplan, J. (2010). What is the simplest quantum field theory? Journal of High Energy Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep09(2010)016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.