Cited by 123Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum chaos and dynamical systems

Shockwave S-matrix from Schwarzian quantum mechanics

Open access
Lam, Ho Tat, Mertens, Thomas G., Turiaci, Gustavo J., Verlinde, Herman·2018·Journal of High Energy Physics

Abstract

Schwarzian quantum mechanics describes the collective IR mode of the SYK model and captures key features of 2D black hole dynamics. Exact results for its correlation functions were obtained in [1]. We compare these results with bulk gravity expectations. We find that the semi-classical limit of the OTO four-point function exactly matches with the scattering amplitude obtained from the Dray-’t Hooft shockwave $$ \mathcal{S} $$ S -matrix. We show that the two point function of heavy operators reduces to the semi-classical saddle-point of the Schwarzian action. We also explain a previously noted match between the OTO four point functions and 2D conformal blocks. Generalizations to higher-point functions are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep11(2018)182

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When the energy is of order C, the two-point correlator becomes thermal with an effective temperature, consistent with ETH.

    “We can verify that when the energy is of order C, this correlator becomes thermal with an effective temperature , consistent with ETH, see section 6.2 of Lam et al. (2018).”

    From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Lam et al. (2018)

  • The heavy limit can be taken both directly in (3.24) or using the sourced saddle, with matching results.

    “The limit can be taken both directly in the expression (3.24), or using the new sourced saddle, with matching results Lam et al. (2018).”

    From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Lam et al. (2018)

  • In the large C limit, only the pole at is relevant, and its residue gives a contribution to the OTOC amplitude (3.41).

    “As shown in Lam et al. (2018), in this limit only the pole at is relevant. Its residue gives a contribution to the OTOC amplitude given by3.41”

    From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Lam et al. (2018)

  • The answer matches specific Virasoro vacuum blocks computed in Chen et al. (2017).

    “This answer also matches with specific Virasoro vacuum blocks computed in Chen et al. (2017), for reasons explained in Lam et al. (2018).”

    From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Lam et al. (2018)

  • More complicated correlators can be computed by diagrammatic rules, which can compute any bilocal Schwarzian correlator or boundary correlators with quantum gravity effects.

    “More complicated correlators can be computed by following a simple set of diagrammatic rules, developed in Mertens et al. (2017) and Lam et al. (2018). These can be used to compute any bilocal Schwarzian correlator, or equivalently the boundary correlators with quantum gravity effects.”

    From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Lam et al. (2018)

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 47 · Cited by 123

Authors
Lam, H. T., Mertens, T. G., Turiaci, G. J., & Verlinde, H.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Mertens, Thomas G.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2018-11
Volume
2018
Issue
11
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799195053
Cited by
123
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 4
FWCI
8.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1620059)
  • Princeton University
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
Keywords
SYK model, scattering matrix, out-of-time-order correlators, 2D black holes, conformal blocks, AdS/CFT correspondence, holographic correlators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review