Beyond toy models: distilling tensor networks in full AdS/CFT
Open accessAbstract
A bstract: We present a general procedure for constructing tensor networks that accurately reproduce holographic states in conformal field theories (CFTs). Given a state in a large- N CFT with a static, semiclassical gravitational dual, we build a tensor network by an iterative series of approximations that eliminate redundant degrees of freedom and minimize the bond dimensions of the resulting network. We argue that the bond dimensions of the tensor network will match the areas of the corresponding bulk surfaces. For “tree” tensor networks (i.e., those that are constructed by discretizing spacetime with non intersecting Ryu-Takayanagi surfaces), our arguments can be made rigorous using a version of one-shot entanglement distillation in the CFT. Using the known quantum error correcting properties of AdS/CFT, we show that bulk legs can be added to the tensor networks to create holographic quantum error correcting codes. These codes behave similarly to previous holographic tensor network toy models, but describe actual bulk excitations in continuum AdS/CFT. By assuming some natural generalizations of the “holographic entanglement of purification” conjecture, we are able to construct tensor networks for more general bulk discretizations, leading to finer-grained networks that partition the information content of a Ryu-Takayanagi surface into tensor-factorized subregions. While the granularity of such a tensor network must be set larger than the string/Planck scales, we expect that it can be chosen to lie well below the AdS scale. However, we also prove a no-go theorem which shows that the bulk-to-boundary maps cannot all be isometries in a tensor network with intersecting Ryu-Takayanagi surfaces.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
We cannot reduce the area fluctuations by more than this without substantially altering the bulk geometry.
“We cannot reduce the area fluctuations by more than this without substantially altering the bulk geometry, see[77,78], for example, for details.”
From Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox (2020) · cites this paper as [77]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 96
- Authors
- Bao, N., Penington, G., Sorce, J., & Wall, A. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Sorce, Jonathan
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 2019
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2903411165
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (82248-13067-44-PHPXH, 1748958)
- U.S. Department of Energy (60933, DESC0019380)
- John Templeton Foundation
- California Institute of Technology
- Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara (1748958, PHY-1748958)
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-, FA9550-16-1-0082, FA9550-16, -16-1-, FA9550-16-1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- tensor networks, AdS/CFT correspondence, holographic entanglement, Ryu-Takayanagi surface, entanglement distillation, entanglement of purification, bond dimension, no-go theorem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review