The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment and outcome of severe intraventricular extension in patients with subarachnoid or intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review of the literature
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients
van Swieten, J. C., Koudstaal, P. J., Visser, M. C., Schouten, H. J., & van Gijn, J. (1988) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.19.5.604 · Cited by 6,512
Cited by
Qureshi, A. I., Mendelow, A. D., & Hanley, D. F. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60371-8 · Cited by 1,526
Bhattathiri, P. S., Gregson, B., Prasad, K. S. M., & Mendelow, A. D. (2006) · Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum · doi:10.1007/3-211-30714-1_16 · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Nieuwkamp, D. J., de Gans, K., Rinkel, G. J. E., & Algra, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology
- Published
- 2000-02-21
- Volume
- 247
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-121
- ISSN
- 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
- 0340-5354
- OpenAlex
- W2161592267
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment and outcome of severe intraventricular extension in patients with subarachnoid or intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review of the literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/pl00007792
- The paper
- Nieuwkamp, D. J., de Gans, K., Rinkel, G. J. E., & Algra, A. (2000). Treatment and outcome of severe intraventricular extension in patients with subarachnoid or intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00007792
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
