Cited by 91Receptor Mechanisms and SignalingProtein Structure and DynamicsProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

Multi-functionality of proteins involved in GPCR and G protein signaling: making sense of structure–function continuum with intrinsic disorder-based proteoforms

Open access
Fonin, Alexander V., Darling, April L., Kuznetsova, Irina M., Turoverov, Konstantin K., Uversky, Vladimir N.·2019·Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences

Abstract

GPCR-G protein signaling system recognizes a multitude of extracellular ligands and triggers a variety of intracellular signaling cascades in response. In humans, this system includes more than 800 various GPCRs and a large set of heterotrimeric G proteins. Complexity of this system goes far beyond a multitude of pair-wise ligand-GPCR and GPCR-G protein interactions. In fact, one GPCR can recognize more than one extracellular signal and interact with more than one G protein. Furthermore, one ligand can activate more than one GPCR, and multiple GPCRs can couple to the same G protein. This defines an intricate multifunctionality of this important signaling system. Here, we show that the multifunctionality of GPCR-G protein system represents an illustrative example of the protein structure-function continuum, where structures of the involved proteins represent a complex mosaic of differently folded regions (foldons, non-foldons, unfoldons, semi-foldons, and inducible foldons). The functionality of resulting highly dynamic conformational ensembles is fine-tuned by various post-translational modifications and alternative splicing, and such ensembles can undergo dramatic changes at interaction with their specific partners. In other words, GPCRs and G proteins exist as sets of conformational/basic, inducible/modified, and functioning proteoforms characterized by a broad spectrum of structural features and possessing various functional potentials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00018-019-03276-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of human GPCRs and G proteins supported by experimental evidence, intrinsic disorder and associated structural plasticity are crucial for this signaling system.

    “Recently, based on the comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of human GPCRs and G proteins supported, at least in part, by experimental evidence, it was concluded that intrinsic disorder and associated structural plasticity are crucial for this signaling system [213].”
  • The multifunctionality of GPCRs and G proteins required for recognition of a wide variety of extracellular signals and transmission is determined by the presence of intrinsic disorder.

    “Therefore, multifunctionality of GPCRs and G proteins, which is required for recognition of a wide variety of extracellular signals and for transmission of this extracellular information for triggering a multitude of the intracellular pathways, is determined by the presence of intrinsic disorder.”
  • The intrinsic disorder-based multifunctionality of the GPCR-G protein signaling system represents an important illustration of the structure-function continuum concept applied to cellular signaling.

    “In other words, this intrinsic disorder-based multifunctionality of the GPCR-G protein signaling system represents an important illustration of the structure–function continuum concept applied to cellular signaling [213].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 227 · Cited by 91

Authors
Fonin, A. V., Darling, A. L., Kuznetsova, I. M., Turoverov, K. K., & Uversky, V. N.
Affiliations
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Uversky, Vladimir N.
Venue
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
Published
2019-08-19
Volume
76
Issue
22
Pages
4461-4492
ISSN
  • 1420-682X (ISSN-L)
  • 1420-9071
OpenAlex
W2969431694
Cited by
91
References
227
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
G protein-coupled receptors, heterotrimeric G proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins, proteoforms, foldons, conformational ensembles, post-translational modification, alternative splicing, receptor-G protein coupling
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Ligands, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Signal Transduction, Heterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review