Multi-functionality of proteins involved in GPCR and G protein signaling: making sense of structure–function continuum with intrinsic disorder-based proteoforms
Open accessAbstract
GPCR-G protein signaling system recognizes a multitude of extracellular ligands and triggers a variety of intracellular signaling cascades in response. In humans, this system includes more than 800 various GPCRs and a large set of heterotrimeric G proteins. Complexity of this system goes far beyond a multitude of pair-wise ligand-GPCR and GPCR-G protein interactions. In fact, one GPCR can recognize more than one extracellular signal and interact with more than one G protein. Furthermore, one ligand can activate more than one GPCR, and multiple GPCRs can couple to the same G protein. This defines an intricate multifunctionality of this important signaling system. Here, we show that the multifunctionality of GPCR-G protein system represents an illustrative example of the protein structure-function continuum, where structures of the involved proteins represent a complex mosaic of differently folded regions (foldons, non-foldons, unfoldons, semi-foldons, and inducible foldons). The functionality of resulting highly dynamic conformational ensembles is fine-tuned by various post-translational modifications and alternative splicing, and such ensembles can undergo dramatic changes at interaction with their specific partners. In other words, GPCRs and G proteins exist as sets of conformational/basic, inducible/modified, and functioning proteoforms characterized by a broad spectrum of structural features and possessing various functional potentials.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Based on comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of human GPCRs and G proteins supported by experimental evidence, intrinsic disorder and associated structural plasticity are crucial for this signaling system.
“Recently, based on the comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of human GPCRs and G proteins supported, at least in part, by experimental evidence, it was concluded that intrinsic disorder and associated structural plasticity are crucial for this signaling system [213].”
From Intrinsically disordered proteins play diverse roles in cell signaling (2022) · cites this paper as [213]
The multifunctionality of GPCRs and G proteins required for recognition of a wide variety of extracellular signals and transmission is determined by the presence of intrinsic disorder.
“Therefore, multifunctionality of GPCRs and G proteins, which is required for recognition of a wide variety of extracellular signals and for transmission of this extracellular information for triggering a multitude of the intracellular pathways, is determined by the presence of intrinsic disorder.”
From Intrinsically disordered proteins play diverse roles in cell signaling (2022) · cites this paper as [213]
The intrinsic disorder-based multifunctionality of the GPCR-G protein signaling system represents an important illustration of the structure-function continuum concept applied to cellular signaling.
“In other words, this intrinsic disorder-based multifunctionality of the GPCR-G protein signaling system represents an important illustration of the structure–function continuum concept applied to cellular signaling [213].”
From Intrinsically disordered proteins play diverse roles in cell signaling (2022) · cites this paper as [213]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 227 · Cited by 91
- Authors
- Fonin, A. V., Darling, A. L., Kuznetsova, I. M., Turoverov, K. K., & Uversky, V. N.
- Affiliations
- Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
- University of South Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Uversky, Vladimir N.
- Venue
- Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
- Published
- 2019-08-19
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 4461-4492
- ISSN
- 1420-682X (ISSN-L)
- 1420-9071
- PMC
- PMC11105632
- OpenAlex
- W2969431694
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 227
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Keywords
- G protein-coupled receptors, heterotrimeric G proteins, intrinsically disordered proteins, proteoforms, foldons, conformational ensembles, post-translational modification, alternative splicing, receptor-G protein coupling
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Ligands, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Signal Transduction, Heterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review