Cited by 265Hydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFish Ecology and Management StudiesIntegrated Water Resources Management

A multi-scale hierarchical framework for developing understanding of river behaviour to support river management

Open access
Gurnell, A. M., Rinaldi, M., Belletti, B., Bizzi, S., Blamauer, B., Braca, G., Buijse, A. D., Bussettini, M. +26 more·2016·Aquatic Sciences

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00027-015-0424-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Belletti B, Rinaldi M, Buijse AD, Gurnell AM, Mosselman E (2015a) A review of assessment methods for river hydromorphology. Environmental Earth Sciences 73: 2079-2100.
  2. Bizzi S, van de Bund W, Demarchi L, Weissteiner C, Grabowski RC (2015) The use of Remote Sensing for characterising hydromorphological properties of European rivers. Aquatic Sciences, First online, DOI: 10.1007/s00027-015-0430-7. · DOI
  3. Brierley GJ, Fryirs KA (2005) Geomorphology and River management: Applications of the River Styles Framework. Blackwell, Malden USA, Oxford UK, Carlton Australia.
  4. Fuller IC, Reid HE, Brierley GJ. (2013) Methods in Geomorphology: Investigating River Channel Form. In: J.F. Shroder (ed) Treatise on Geomorphology, Academic Press, San Diego, pp 73- 91.
  5. González del Tánago M, García de Jalón D. (2004) Hierarchical Classification of Rivers: A proposal for eco-geomorphic characterization of Spanish rivers within the European Water Frame Directive. In: García de Jalón D, Vizcaíno P (eds.) Aquatic Habitats, Analysis and Restoration, Fifth International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, IAHR Congress Proceedings, Madrid, Spain, 205-211.
  6. González del Tánago M, Martínez-Fernández V, García de Jalón D (2015b) Diagnosing problems produced by flow regulation in Southern European rivers: The Porma and Curueño Rivers (Duero Basin, NW Spain). Aquatic Sciences, First online, DOI: 10.1007/s00027-015-0428-1. · DOI
  7. Grabowski RC, Surian N, Gurnell AM (2014) Characterizing geomorphological change to support sustainable river restoration and management. WIREs Water, doi:10.1002/wat2.1037. · DOI
  8. Grabowski RC, Gurnell AM (2015) Diagnosing problems of fine sediment delivery and transfer in lowland, Northwest European catchments: The Frome catchment, southern England. Aquatic Sciences, First online, DOI: 10.1007/s00027-015-0426-3. · DOI
  9. Grant GE, Swanson FJ, Wolman MG (1990) Pattern and origin of stepped-bed morphology in high gradient streams, Western Cascades, Oregon. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 102: 340-354.
  10. Knighton AD, Nanson GC. (1993) Anastomosis and the continuum of channel pattern. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 18(7): 613-625.
  11. Kondolf GM, Montgomery DR, Piégay H, Schmitt L (2003) Geomorphic classification of rivers and streams. In: Kondolf GM, Piégay H (eds) Tools in fluvial geomorphology, Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp 171-204.
  12. Merovich GT, Petty JT, Strager MP, Fulton JB. (2013) Hierarchical classification of stream condition: a house-neighborhood framework for establishing conservation priorities in complex riverscapes, Freshwater Science 32(3): 874-891, doi:10.1899/12-082. · DOI
  13. Montgomery DR, Buffington JM. (1997) Channel reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geological Society of America Bulletin 109: 596-611.
  14. Naiman RJ, Bilby RE (eds) River ecology and management, Springer-Verlag Inc., New York, pp 13-42.
  15. Montgomery DR, MacDonald LH. (2002) Diagnostic approach to stream channel assessment and monitoring. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38: 1-16.
  16. Naiman RJ, Lonzarich DG, Beechie TJ, Ralph SC (1992) General principles of classification and the assessment of conservation potential in rivers. In: Boon PJ, Calow P, Petts GE (eds) River Conservation and Management, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, pp 93-123.
  17. Nanson GC. (2013) Anabranching and Anastomosing Rivers. In: John F. Shroder (ed) Treatise on Geomorphology, Volume 9, Academic Press, San Diego, pp 330-345.
  18. Nanson GC, Croke JC. (1992) A genetic classification of floodplains. Geomorphology 4(6): 459-486.
  19. Nanson GC, Knighton AD. (1996) Anabranching rivers: their causes, character and classification. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 21(3): 217-239.
  20. Rinaldi M, Surian N, Comiti F, Bussettini M (2015a) A methodological framework for hydromorphological assessment, analysis and monitoring (IDRAIM) aimed at promoting integrate driver management. Geomorphology, doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.05.010. · DOI
  21. Snelder TH, Biggs BJF (2002) Multiscale river environment classification for water resources management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38: 1225-1239.
  22. Ziliani L, Surian N (2015) Reconstructing temporal changes and prediction of channel evolution in a large Alpine river: the Tagliamento River, Italy. Aquatic Sciences, First online, DOI: 10.1007/s00027-015-0431-6. http://image2000.jrc.ec.europa.eu/index.cfm/page/image20 00_overview Channel planform, vegetation/land use LandSat (4,5,7,8) Satellite Imagery 30 m resolution (15m from 1999), 1982-present http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ http://glovis.usgs.gov/ Channel planform, vegetation/land use ASTER Satellite Imagery 30m resolution http://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/index.asp Channel planform, vegetation/land use Declassified Satellite Imagery (Corona, KH-7, KH-9) 1'-50' resolution, 1960-1980, spatial coverage varies http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ Channel planform, vegetation/land use European Water Archive Flow data (daily/monthly) from 3800 gauging stations, 441 are near-natural catchments http://www.bafg.de/GRDC/EN/04_spcldtbss/42_EWA/ewa. html Hydrology CCM2 Database Pan-European database of river networks and catchments http://ccm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/php/index.php?action=view&id= 23 · DOI
  23. Inferred channel network from DEM, catchment boundaries and characteristics Ecrins -European catchments and rivers network system Improved river network based on CCM2, FEC -functional elemental catchments based on Strahler number http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/european- catchments-and-rivers-network Inferred channel network from DEM, catchment boundaries, lakes Corine Land Cover Land cover data (1990, 2000, 2006), resolution = 100 m http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps Land use / cover One Geology Europe Surficial geology coverage for Europe, resolution varies http://www.onegeology.org/ Geology

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gurnell, A. M., Rinaldi, M., Belletti, B., Bizzi, S., Blamauer, B., Braca, G., Buijse, A. D., Bussettini, M., Camenen, B., Comiti, F., Demarchi, L., García de Jalón, D., González del Tánago, M., Grabowski, R. C., Gunn, I. D. M., Habersack, H., Hendriks, D., Henshaw, A. J., Klösch, M., Lastoria, B., Latapie, A., Marcinkowski, P., Martínez-Fernández, V., Mosselman, E., Mountford, J. O., Nardi, L., Okruszko, T., O’Hare, M. T., Palma, M., Percopo, C., Surian, N., van de Bund, W., Weissteiner, C., & Ziliani, L.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • European Commission (BE)
  • BOKU University (AT)
  • Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale (IT)
  • Deltares (NL)
  • Institut National de Recherche en Sciences et Technologies pour l'Environnement et l'Agriculture (FR)
  • Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (IT)
  • Cranfield University (GB)
  • Warsaw University of Life Sciences (PL)
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
  • University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Gurnell, A. M.
Venue
Aquatic Sciences
Published
2015-09-22
Volume
78
Issue
1
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 1015-1621 (ISSN-L)
  • 1420-9055
OpenAlex
W1734912905
Cited by
265
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 9
FWCI
19.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aquatic Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • Cemadoc (Cemagref / IRSTEA) (submittedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Seventh Framework Programme (282656)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Integrated Water Resources Management
Keywords
river hydromorphology, river management, sediment supply, water production, river restoration, reform projects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review