Cited by 135Aging, Health, and DisabilityHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealth and Medical Studies

Monitoring population disability: evaluation of a new Global Activity Limitation Indicator (GALI)

van Oyen, Herman, Van der Heyden, Johan, Perenboom, Rom, Jagger, Carol·2006·Sozial- und Präventivmedizin

Abstract

Objective To evaluate a single item instrument, the Global Activity Limitation Indicator (GALI), to measure long-standing health related activity limitations, against several health indicators: a composite morbidity indicator, instruments measuring mental health (SCL-90R, GHQ-12), physical co-morbidity and physical limitations (ADLs, SF-36). Methods Cross-sectional data (n = 9168) of the 2001-National Health Interview Survey in Belgium was used to compare the GALI with other health indicators across gender, age, educational attainment and language. Results Responses to the GALI were similar to responses to other indicators of physical limitations (Limitations in Activities of Daily Living (by severity or by number of limitations), the SF-36 physical domain), to an indicator of chronic physical comorbidity and to indicators of mental health. The probability of reporting absence of long-standing activity limitation with the GALI was high in subjects without physical limitations or physical or mental conditions. This probability decreased as the severity or number of limitations, the number of physical or mental conditions increased. Conclusions The GALI performs appropriately against other health indicators and appears to reflect long-standing activity limitation associated with both mental and physical conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00038-006-0035-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Oyen, H., Van der Heyden, J., Perenboom, R., & Jagger, C.
Affiliations
  • Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Venue
Sozial- und Präventivmedizin
Published
2006-06
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
153-161
ISSN
  • 0303-8408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1420-911X
OpenAlex
W2030293222
Cited by
135
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
Keywords
activity limitation, disability assessment, physical limitations, activities of daily living, mental health, SF-36 physical functioning, National Health Interview Survey, Belgium
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Belgium, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disability Evaluation, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review