Setting-based interventions to promote mental health at the university: a systematic review
Abstract
Objectives Universities are dynamic environments. But university life presents challenges that may affect the mental health of its community. Higher education institutions provide opportunities to promote public health. Our objective is to summarise the current evidence on strategies to promote mental health at the university, following a setting-based model. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review following standard methods. Published literature that evaluated structural and organizations strategies to promote mental health at the university was selected. Results 19 papers were included. The majority of the studies were targeting the students, with only four aiming to promote employees' mental health. The most promising strategies to promote mental wellbeing included changes in the way students are taught and assessed. On the other hand, social marketing strategies had not impact on mental health. There is inconclusive evidence related to the effectiveness of policies to promote mental health. Conclusions Universities should invest in creating supportive physical, social and academic environments that promote student and staff mental wellbeing. However, the current body of evidence is scarce and more research is needed to recommend what are the best strategies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Structural efforts to build health-promoting learning environments for all students are lacking in the literature.
“However, structural efforts to build health-promoting learning environments for all students are lacking in the literature (Fernandez et al. 2016).”
From Health-Promoting Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review of Structural Interventions to Protect Student Mental Health (2024) · cites this paper as Fernandez et al. 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 147
- Authors
- Fernandez, A., Howse, E., Rubio-Valera, M., Thorncraft, K., Noone, J., Luu, X., Veness, B., Leech, M., Llewellyn, G., & Salvador-Carulla, L.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Red de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud (ES)
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
- Venue
- International Journal of Public Health
- Published
- 2016-06-30
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 797-807
- ISSN
- 1661-8556 (ISSN-L)
- 1661-8564
- OpenAlex
- W2474372169
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Sydney
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
- Keywords
- mental health promotion, university students, higher education, organizational strategy, student well-being, teaching and assessment, social marketing, mental health policy, workplace mental health
- MeSH terms
- Curriculum, Faculty, Health Promotion, Humans, Mental Health, Social Support, Students, Universities, Policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review