Cited by 147Student Stress and CopingSchool Health and Nursing EducationHealth and Lifestyle Studies

Setting-based interventions to promote mental health at the university: a systematic review

Fernandez, A., Howse, E., Rubio-Valera, M., Thorncraft, K., Noone, J., Luu, X., Veness, B., Leech, M. +2 more·2016·International Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives Universities are dynamic environments. But university life presents challenges that may affect the mental health of its community. Higher education institutions provide opportunities to promote public health. Our objective is to summarise the current evidence on strategies to promote mental health at the university, following a setting-based model. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review following standard methods. Published literature that evaluated structural and organizations strategies to promote mental health at the university was selected. Results 19 papers were included. The majority of the studies were targeting the students, with only four aiming to promote employees' mental health. The most promising strategies to promote mental wellbeing included changes in the way students are taught and assessed. On the other hand, social marketing strategies had not impact on mental health. There is inconclusive evidence related to the effectiveness of policies to promote mental health. Conclusions Universities should invest in creating supportive physical, social and academic environments that promote student and staff mental wellbeing. However, the current body of evidence is scarce and more research is needed to recommend what are the best strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00038-016-0846-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 147

Authors
Fernandez, A., Howse, E., Rubio-Valera, M., Thorncraft, K., Noone, J., Luu, X., Veness, B., Leech, M., Llewellyn, G., & Salvador-Carulla, L.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Red de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud (ES)
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
Venue
International Journal of Public Health
Published
2016-06-30
Volume
61
Issue
7
Pages
797-807
ISSN
  • 1661-8556 (ISSN-L)
  • 1661-8564
OpenAlex
W2474372169
Cited by
147
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Sydney
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
Keywords
mental health promotion, university students, higher education, organizational strategy, student well-being, teaching and assessment, social marketing, mental health policy, workplace mental health
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Faculty, Health Promotion, Humans, Mental Health, Social Support, Students, Universities, Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review