The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ 1 Minimization
Abstract
It is now well understood that (1) it is possible to reconstruct sparse signals exactly from what appear to be highly incomplete sets of linear measurements and (2) that this can be done by constrained ℓ1 minimization. In this paper, we study a novel method for sparse signal recovery that in many situations outperforms ℓ1 minimization in the sense that substantially fewer measurements are needed for exact recovery. The algorithm consists of solving a sequence of weighted ℓ1-minimization problems where the weights used for the next iteration are computed from the value of the current solution. We present a series of experiments demonstrating the remarkable performance and broad applicability of this algorithm in the areas of sparse signal recovery, statistical estimation, error correction and image processing. Interestingly, superior gains are also achieved when our method is applied to recover signals with assumed near-sparsity in overcomplete representations—not by reweighting the ℓ1 norm of the coefficient sequence as is common, but by reweighting the ℓ1 norm of the transformed object. An immediate consequence is the possibility of highly efficient data acquisition protocols by improving on a technique known as Compressive Sensing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Self-citationRegression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties
Zou, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000735 · Cited by 7,470
Huber, P. J. (1981) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725250 · Cited by 7,066
Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares.
Holland, P. W., & Welsch, R. E. (1977) · Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610927708827533 · Cited by 2,115
Exact Reconstruction of Sparse Signals via Nonconvex Minimization
Chartrand, R. (2007) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2007.898300 · Cited by 1,277
Cited by
Majorization-Minimization Algorithms in Signal Processing, Communications, and Machine Learning
Sun, Y., Babu, P., & Palomar, D. P. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2016.2601299 · Cited by 1,820
Nonlocally Centralized Sparse Representation for Image Restoration
Dong, W., Zhang, L., Shi, G., & Li, X. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2012.2235847 · Cited by 1,505
Challenges of Big Data analysis
Fan, J., Han, F., & Liu, H. (2014) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwt032 · Cited by 1,482
Iteratively reweighted algorithms for compressive sensing
Chartrand, R., & Yin, W. (2008) · 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2008.4518498 · Cited by 1,248
Group Sparse Beamforming for Green Cloud-RAN
(2014) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2014.040214.131770 · Cited by 468
Metadata
- Authors
- Candès, E. J., Wakin, M. B., & Boyd, S. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications
- Published
- 2008-10-15
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 877-905
- ISSN
- 1069-5869 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5851
- OpenAlex
- W2107861471
- Cited by
- 4,863
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 152.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ 1 Minimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00041-008-9045-x
- The paper
- Candès, E. J., Wakin, M. B., & Boyd, S. P. (2008). Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ 1 Minimization. Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00041-008-9045-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.