Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Banded versus modified appliances for anchorage during maxillary protraction

Liu, Chunyan, Qiao, Xing, Zhang, Shilong, Ma, Wensheng, Wang, Wen, Ge, Xiaolei, Hu, Xiaoying, Kang, Wenjing, Lu, Haiyan·2020·Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
DOI 10.1007/s00056-019-00214-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00056-019-00214-5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 2

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Molina-Berlanga N, Llopis-Perez J, Flores-Mir C, Puigdollers A (2013) Lower incisor dentoalveolar compensation and symphysis dimensions among class I and III malocclusion patients with different facial vertical skeletal patterns. Angle Orthod 83:948–955 · DOI
  2. Ellis EE, McNamara JA (1984) Components of adult Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 85:277–290 · DOI
  3. Suda N, Ishii-Suzuki M, Hirose K, Hiyama S, Suzuki S, Kuroda T (2000) Effective treatment plan for maxillary protraction: is the bone age useful to determine the treatment plan? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:56–62 · doi:10.1067/mod.2000.104491
  4. Kajiyama K, Murakami T, Suzuki A (2000) Evaluation of the modified maxillary protractor applied to class III malocclusion with retruded maxilla in early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:549–559 · doi:10.1067/mod.2000.110169
  5. Sar C, Arman-Özçirpici A, Uçkan S, Yazici AC (2011) Comparative evaluationof maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:636–649 · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.039
  6. Elnagar MH, Elshourbagy E, Ghobashy S, Khedr M, Evans CA (2016) Comparative evaluation of 2 skeletallyanchored maxillary protraction protocols. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 150:751–762 · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.025
  7. Atalay Z, Tortop T (2010) Dentofacial effects of a modified tandem traction bow appliance. Eur J Orthod 32:655–661 · doi:10.1093/ejo/cjp153
  8. Ngan P, Cheung E, Wei SHY (2007) Comparison of protraction facemask response using banded and bonded expansion appliances as anchorage. Semin Orthod 13:175–185 · doi:10.1053/j.sodo.2007.05.003
  9. Shrestha S, Sharma AK, Lamichhane B (2016) Oral health status in patients with fixed orthodontic appliance with molar bands and bonded tubes. Orthod J Nepal 1:27–31 · DOI
  10. Liu W, Zhou Y, Wang X, Liu D, Zhou S (2015) Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vsexpansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 148:641–651 · DOI
  11. Wang YC, Chang PMS, Liou EJW (2009) Opening of circumaxillary sutures by alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions. Angle Orthod 79:230–234 · doi:10.2319/031208-141.1
  12. Tortop T, Keykubat A, Yukse S (2007) Facemask therapy with and without expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132:467–474 · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.047
  13. Vaugh GA, Mason B, Moon HB, Turley PK (2005) The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128:299–309 · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.030
  14. Yoshida I, Shoji T, Mizoguchi I (2007) Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies. Eur J Orthod 29:126–133 · doi:10.1093/ejo/cjl087
  15. Cozza P, Marino A, Mucedero M (2004) An orthopaedic approach to the treatment of class III malocclusions in the early mixed dentition. Eur J Orthod 26:191–199 · doi:10.1093/ejo/26.2.191
  16. Kircelli BH, Pektas ZO (2008) Midfacial protraction with skeletally anchored face mask therapy: a novel approach and preliminary results. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 133:440–449 · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.06.011
  17. Kilic N, Catal G, Kiki A, Oktay H (2010) Soft tissue profile changes following maxillary protraction in class III subjects. Eur J Orthod 32:419–424 · doi:10.1093/ejo/cjp119
  18. Mouakeh M (2001) Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial pattern of Syrian children with class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119:640–649 · doi:10.1067/mod.2001.112671

Metadata

Authors
Liu, C., Qiao, X., Zhang, S., Ma, W., Wang, W., Ge, X., Hu, X., Kang, W., & Lu, H.
Venue
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-02-27
Volume
81
Issue
3
Pages
172-182
ISSN
  • 1434-5293
  • 1615-6714
DOI
10.1007/s00056-019-00214-5
Cited by
2
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Banded versus modified appliances for anchorage during maxillary protraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00056-019-00214-5
The paper
Liu, C., Qiao, X., Zhang, S., Ma, W., Wang, W., Ge, X., Hu, X., Kang, W., & Lu, H. (2020). Banded versus modified appliances for anchorage during maxillary protraction. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-019-00214-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.