Cited by 13Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGender, Feminism, and MediaStalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sexting als Risiko?: Zum konsensuellen und nichtkonsensuellen Versand persönlicher erotischer Fotos mittels digitaler Medien

Dekker, Arne, Thula Koops·2017·Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz

Abstract

Background Digital media are used for the purpose of various sexual experiences. In recent years the exchange of erotic text messages or images ("sexting") has gained the attention of academic research and has increasingly been the center of public discussion on sexual boundary violations and violence via digital media. The unwanted forwarding of images to a third party is especially relevant in this respect. In contrast to media reports about sexting as a risk behavior with serious consequences, there is little empirical analysis about the actual sexting practice of adolescents and adults in Germany. Objective This paper is the first to describe sexting behavior of young adults in Germany on the basis of a large representative student sample. Material and methods Data were collected in 2012 in the course of a nationwide study. Students from 15 universities were asked among other things about their experiences with sending erotic text messages or images, the non-consensual forwarding of images and its consequences. Results More than half of the student sample reported sending erotic text messages, 26.8% of women and 16.8% of men had sent erotic images to someone, in most cases to their partner. Of the sexters, 2% mentioned that their images had been forwarded to another person without their consent. Conclusion The results indicate that in Germany sexting is mostly practiced in the context of a romantic relationship. Only a small percentage experience unwanted forwarding of images, and negative consequences are not reported for all incidents; however, this does not relativize the impact of those events implicating serious negative consequences for the involved person.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00103-017-2595-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Dekker A, Koops T, Briken P (2016) Sexualisierte Grenzverletzungen und Gewalt mittels digitaler Medien. Expertise zur Bedeutung digitaler Medien für Phänomene sexualisierter Grenzverletzungen und Gewalt gegen Kinder und Jugendliche. Unabhängiger Beauftragter für Fragen des sexuellen Kindesmissbrauchs, Berlin
  2. Ospina M, Harstall C, Dennett L (2010) Sexual exploitation of children and youth over the internet: a rapid review of the scientific literature. Edmonton: Institute of Health Economics. http://www.ihe.ca/download/sexual_exploitation_of_children_and_youth_over_the_internet_a_rapid_review_of_the_scientific_literature.pdf . Zugegriffen: 27. Febr. 2017
  3. Döring N (2012) Erotischer Fotoaustausch unter Jugendlichen: Verbreitung, Funktionen und Folgen des Sexting. Z Sexualforsch 25:4–25 · DOI
  4. Henry N, Powell A (2016) Technology-facilitated sexual violence: a literature rebiew of empirical research. Trauma Violence Abus 17:1–14
  5. Döring N (2014) Consensual sexting among adolescents: risk prevention through abstinence education or safer sexting? Cyberpsychology 8:article 9 · DOI
  6. Klettke B, Hallford DJ, Mellor DJ (2014) Sexting prevalence and correlates: a systematic literature review. Clin Psychol Rev 34:44–53 · DOI
  7. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest (2015) JIM 2015. Jugend, Information, Multimedia. Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19jähriger
  8. Schmidt G (Hrsg) (2000) Kinder der sexuellen Revolution. Kontinuität und Wandel studentischer Sexualität 1966–1996. Psychosozial-Verlag, Gießen
  9. Clement U (1986) Sexualität im sozialen Wandel. Eine empirische Vergleichsstudie an Studenten 1966 und 1981. Enke, Stuttgart
  10. Giese H, Schmidt G (1968) Studentensexualität. Verhalten und Einstellungen. Eine Umfrage an 12 westdeutschen Universitäten. Rowohlt, Hamburg
  11. Dekker A, Matthiesen S (2015) Studentische Sexualität im Wandel: 1966 – 1981 – 1996 – 2012. Z Sexualforsch 28:245–271 · DOI
  12. Strassberg DS, McKinnon RK, Sustaíta MA, Rullo J (2013) Sexting by high school students: an exploratory and descriptive study. Arch Sex Behav 42:15–21 · DOI
  13. Fein H (2011) Judging victims: why we stigmatize survivors, and how they reclaim respect. Contemp Sociol 40:27–28 · DOI
  14. Döring N (2015) Sexting. Aktueller Forschungsstand und Schlussfolgerungen für die Praxis. In: Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft Kinder- und Jugendschutz (Hrsg) Gewalt Im Netz. Sexting, Cybermobbing & Co. BAJ, Berlin
  15. Poelchau H‑W, Briken P, Wazlawik M, Bauer U, Fegert JM, Kavemann B (2015) Bonner Ethik-Erklärung. Empfehlungen für die Forschung zu sexueller Gewalt in pädagogischen Kontexten. Z Sexualforsch 28:153–160 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dekker, A., & Koops, T.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Dekker, Arne
Venue
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
Published
2017-07-24
Volume
60
Issue
9
Pages
1034-1039
ISSN
  • 0007-5914 (ISSN-L)
  • 1436-9990
  • 1437-1588
OpenAlex
W2738428466
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
Keywords
sexting, erotic images, non-consensual image sharing, sexual boundary violations, online sexual violence, young adults, romantic relationships, student population, Germany
MeSH terms
Cross-Sectional Studies, Erotica, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Photography, Risk Factors, Sexual Behavior, Sex Offenses, Students, Crime Victims, Presumed Consent, Young Adult, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review