Cited by 188Cellular transport and secretionRNA Research and SplicingGenomics and Rare Diseases

Amphiphysin 2 (BIN1) in physiology and diseases

Prokic, Ivana, Cowling, Belinda S., Laporte, Jocelyn·2014·Journal of Molecular Medicine

Abstract

Amphiphysin 2, also named bridging integrator-1 (BIN1) or SH3P9, has been recently implicated in rare and common diseases affecting different tissues and physiological functions. BIN1 downregulation is linked to cancer progression and also correlates with ventricular cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia preceding heart failure. Increased BIN1 expression is linked to increased susceptibility for late-onset Alzheimer's disease. In addition, altered splicing may account for the muscle component of myotonic dystrophies, while recessive germinal mutations cause centronuclear myopathy. Despite undoubtedly underlining the relevance of BIN1 in human diseases, the molecular and cellular bases leading to such different diseases are unclear at present. BIN1 is a key regulator of endocytosis and membrane recycling, cytoskeleton regulation, DNA repair, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis. In light of the recent findings on the molecular, cellular, and physiological roles of BIN1, we discuss potential pathological mechanisms and highlight common disease pathways and also tissue-specific regulation. Next challenges will be to validate BIN1 both as a prognostic marker for the related diseases and as a potential therapeutic target.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00109-014-1138-1

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prokic, I., Cowling, B. S., & Laporte, J.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Laporte, Jocelyn
Venue
Journal of Molecular Medicine
Published
2014-03-05
Volume
92
Issue
5
Pages
453-463
ISSN
  • 0946-2716 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1440
OpenAlex
W2095715640
Cited by
188
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
BIN1, endocytosis, membrane recycling, cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrhythmias, heart failure, Alzheimer's disease, myotonic dystrophy, centronuclear myopathy, splicing, tumor progression, cytoskeleton regulation, DNA repair, apoptosis, prognostic factors, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Cell Cycle, DNA Repair, Gene Expression Regulation, Heart Diseases, Humans, Myotonic Dystrophy, Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Apoptosis, Myopathies, Structural, Congenital

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review