Thymus-derived Foxp3+ regulatory T cells upregulate RORγt expression under inflammatory conditions
Abstract
Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) co-expressing the Th17-lineage specification factor RORγt represent a unique Treg subpopulation that has been reported to be induced upon response to gut microbiota within the intestinal immune system. Hence, RORγt+ Tregs are considered to solely consist of peripherally induced Foxp3+ Tregs (pTregs), and the possibility that also thymus-derived Treg (tTregs) can upregulate RORγt expression and contribute to the pool of RORγt+ Tregs was largely ignored. Here, we expand our knowledge on the origin of RORγt+ Tregs by demonstrating that also tTregs can attain RORγt expression. In transgenic Foxp3∆CNS1-Cre reporter mice, a substantial fraction of CNS1-independent Tregs, predominantly consisting of tTregs, was found to co-express RORγt. In addition, genuine tTregs isolated from thymi of Foxp3 hCD2 RAG GFP reporter mice initiated RORγt expression both in vitro and in vivo, particularly under inflammatory conditions. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that tTregs can upregulate RORγt expression under inflammatory conditions and that hence RORγt+ Tregs can be regarded as a heterogeneous population consisting of both pTregs and tTregs. KEY MESSAGES: RORγt cannot be considered as a marker for pTregs. CNS1-independent tTregs within the colon display RORγt expression. RORγt can be induced in genuine tTregs, particularly under inflammatory conditions. RORγt+ Tregs are a heterogeneous population consisting of both pTregs and tTregs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Helios, Nrp-1 or ROR-γt are widely accepted for the discrimination of tTreg and pTreg cells under homeostatic conditions.
“Yet, Helios, Nrp-1 or ROR-γt are widely accepted for the discrimination of tTreg and pTreg cells under homeostatic conditions [364-366, 437-440].”
From Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (third edition) (2021) · cites this paper as [440]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Yang, J., Zou, M., Pezoldt, J., Zhou, X., & Huehn, J.
- Affiliations
- Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (DE)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Huehn, Jochen
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Medicine
- Published
- 2018-10-24
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1387-1394
- ISSN
- 0946-2716 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1440
- OpenAlex
- W2898426340
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung (Fellowship)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB738-C7)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › IL-33, ST2, and ILC Pathways
- Keywords
- Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, RORγt, thymus-derived regulatory T cells, peripheral regulatory T cells, Treg heterogeneity, inflammatory diseases, gut microbiota, intestinal immunity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Colitis, Inflammation, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Up-Regulation, Adoptive Transfer, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 1, Group F, Member 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review