Cited by 88Adhesion, Friction, and Surface InteractionsForce Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Materials and Mechanics

Beetle adhesive hairs differ in stiffness and stickiness: in vivo adhesion measurements on individual setae

Bullock, James M. R., Federle, Walter·2011·Naturwissenschaften

Abstract

Leaf beetles are able to climb on smooth and rough surfaces using arrays of micron-sized adhesive hairs (setae) of varying morphology. We report the first in vivo adhesive force measurements of individual setae in the beetle Gastrophysa viridula, using a smooth polystyrene substrate attached to a glass capillary micro-cantilever. The beetles possess three distinct adhesive pads on each leg which differ in function and setal morphology. Visualisation of pull-offs allowed forces to be measured for each tarsal hair type. Male discoidal hairs adhered with the highest forces (919 ± 104 nN, mean ± SE), followed by spatulate (582 ± 59 nN) and pointed (127 ± 19 nN) hairs. Discoidal hairs were stiffer in the normal direction (0.693 ± 0.111 N m(-1)) than spatulate (0.364 ± 0.039 N m(-1)) or pointed (0.192 ± 0.044 N m(-1)) hairs. The greater adhesion on smooth surfaces and the higher stability of discoidal hairs help male beetles to achieve strong adhesion on the elytra of females during copulation. A comparison of pull-off forces measured for single setae and whole pads (arrays) revealed comparable levels of adhesive stress. This suggests that beetles are able to achieve equal load sharing across their adhesive pads so that detachment through peeling is prevented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00114-011-0781-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It has been suggested that this is partially caused by a reduction in contact area or unequal load-sharing between or within lamellae, but no measurements supporting this have been presented.

    “It has been suggested that this is partially caused by a reduction in contact area or unequal load-sharing between or within lamellae [6,29], but no measurements supporting this have been presented.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 88

Authors
Bullock, J. M. R., & Federle, W.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Federle, Walter
Venue
Naturwissenschaften
Published
2011-04-05
Volume
98
Issue
5
Pages
381-387
ISSN
  • 0028-1042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1904
OpenAlex
W2077841897
Cited by
88
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Die Naturwissenschaften (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/I008667/1, BB/E004156/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
Keywords
Chrysomelidae, Gastrophysa viridula, setae, adhesion force, pull-off force, load sharing, copulation, elytra
MeSH terms
Animals, Coleoptera, Sensilla

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review