Beetle adhesive hairs differ in stiffness and stickiness: in vivo adhesion measurements on individual setae
Abstract
Leaf beetles are able to climb on smooth and rough surfaces using arrays of micron-sized adhesive hairs (setae) of varying morphology. We report the first in vivo adhesive force measurements of individual setae in the beetle Gastrophysa viridula, using a smooth polystyrene substrate attached to a glass capillary micro-cantilever. The beetles possess three distinct adhesive pads on each leg which differ in function and setal morphology. Visualisation of pull-offs allowed forces to be measured for each tarsal hair type. Male discoidal hairs adhered with the highest forces (919 ± 104 nN, mean ± SE), followed by spatulate (582 ± 59 nN) and pointed (127 ± 19 nN) hairs. Discoidal hairs were stiffer in the normal direction (0.693 ± 0.111 N m(-1)) than spatulate (0.364 ± 0.039 N m(-1)) or pointed (0.192 ± 0.044 N m(-1)) hairs. The greater adhesion on smooth surfaces and the higher stability of discoidal hairs help male beetles to achieve strong adhesion on the elytra of females during copulation. A comparison of pull-off forces measured for single setae and whole pads (arrays) revealed comparable levels of adhesive stress. This suggests that beetles are able to achieve equal load sharing across their adhesive pads so that detachment through peeling is prevented.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It has been suggested that this is partially caused by a reduction in contact area or unequal load-sharing between or within lamellae, but no measurements supporting this have been presented.
“It has been suggested that this is partially caused by a reduction in contact area or unequal load-sharing between or within lamellae [6,29], but no measurements supporting this have been presented.”
From Human climbing with efficiently scaled gecko-inspired dry adhesives (2015) · cites this paper as [29]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 88
- Authors
- Bullock, J. M. R., & Federle, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Federle, Walter
- ORCID
- Federle, Walter
- Venue
- Naturwissenschaften
- Published
- 2011-04-05
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 381-387
- ISSN
- 0028-1042 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1904
- OpenAlex
- W2077841897
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Die Naturwissenschaften (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/I008667/1, BB/E004156/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
- Keywords
- Chrysomelidae, Gastrophysa viridula, setae, adhesion force, pull-off force, load sharing, copulation, elytra
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Coleoptera, Sensilla
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review