Genetic mapping in pea. 1. RAPD-based genetic linkage map of Pisum sativum
Abstract
A genetic linkage map of Pisum sativum L. was constructed based primarily on RAPD markers that were carefully selected for their reproducibility and scored in a population of 139 recombinant inbred lines (RILs). The mapping population was derived from a cross between a protein-rich dry-seed cultivar 'Terese' and an increased branching mutant (K586) obtained from the pea cultivar 'Torsdag'. The map currently comprises nine linkage groups with two groups comprising only 6 markers (n = 7 in pea) and covers 1139 cM. This RAPD-based map has been aligned with the map based on the (JI281 x JI399) RILs population that currently includes 355 markers in seven linkage groups covering 1881 cM. The difference in map lengths is discussed. For this alignment 7 RFLPs, 23 RAPD markers, the morphological marker le and the PCR marker corresponding to the gene Uni were used as common markers and scored in both populations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PsBRC1 maps to pea linkage group IV close to Fa in a region where no RMS genes were ever mapped.
“PsBRC1 was then mapped using the recombinant inbred line population (Te ´re `se 3 Torsdag; Laucou et al., 1998) to the pea linkage group IV close to Fa in a region where no RMS genes were ever mapped”
From The Pea TCP Transcription Factor PsBRC1 Acts Downstream of Strigolactones to Control Shoot Branching (2012) · cites this paper as Laucou et al., 1998
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sorefan, K., Booker, J., Haurogné, K., Goussot, M., Bainbridge, K., Foo, E., Chatfield, S., Ward, S., Beveridge, C., Rameau, C., et al. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.256603 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Pea TCP Transcription Factor PsBRC1 Acts Downstream of Strigolactones to Control Shoot Branching
Braun, N., de Saint Germain, A., Pillot, J.-P., Boutet-Mercey, S., Dalmais, M., Antoniadi, I., Li, X., Maia-Grondard, A., Le Signor, C., Bouteiller, N., et al. (2012) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.111.182725 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Laucou, V., Haurogné, K., Ellis, N., & Rameau, C.
- Affiliations
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- John Innes Centre (GB)
- Venue
- Theoretical and Applied Genetics
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 5-6
- Pages
- 905-915
- ISSN
- 0040-5752 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2242
- OpenAlex
- W2055136140
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Theoretical and Applied Genetics (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Soybean genetics and cultivation
- Keywords
- Pisum sativum, pea, genetic linkage map, RAPD markers, recombinant inbred lines, linkage groups, map alignment, RFLP markers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review