Cited by 155Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Research

Cost-utility analyses of intensive blood glucose and tight blood pressure control in type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 72)

Open access
Clarke, P. M., Gray, A. M., Briggs, A., Stevens, R. J., Matthews, D. R., Holman, R. R., on behalf of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS)·2005·Diabetologia

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: This study estimated the economic efficiency (1) of intensive blood glucose control and tight blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes who also had hypertension, and (2) of metformin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients who were overweight. METHODS: We conducted cost-utility analysis based on patient-level data from a randomised clinical controlled trial involving 4,209 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes conducted in 23 hospital-based clinics in England, Scotland and Northern Ireland as part of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). Three different policies were evaluated: intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylurea/insulin; intensive blood glucose control with metformin for overweight patients; and tight blood pressure control of hypertensive patients. Incremental cost : effectiveness ratios were calculated based on the net cost of healthcare resources associated with these policies and on effectiveness in terms of quality-adjusted life years gained, estimated over a lifetime from within-trial effects using the UKPDS Outcomes Model. RESULTS: The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life years gained (in year 2004 UK prices) for intensive blood glucose control was 6,028 UK pounds, and for blood pressure control was 369 UK pounds. Metformin therapy was cost-saving and increased quality-adjusted life expectancy. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Each of the three policies evaluated has a lower cost per quality-adjusted life year gained than that of many other accepted uses of healthcare resources. The results provide an economic rationale for ensuring that care of patients with type 2 diabetes corresponds at least to the levels of these interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-005-1717-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 155

Authors
Clarke, P. M., Gray, A. M., Briggs, A., Stevens, R. J., Matthews, D. R., Holman, R. R., & (UKPDS), O. B. O. T. U. P. D. S.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Clarke, P. M.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2005-04-15
Volume
48
Issue
5
Pages
868-877
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W1985123503
Cited by
155
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
34.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • British Heart Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (300565)
  • National Eye Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, tight glycemic control, tight blood pressure control, hypertension, metformin, sulfonylureas, insulin, cost-utility analysis, quality-adjusted life years, economic efficiency, overweight patients, health care costs
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Costs and Cost Analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, United Kingdom, Humans, Hypertension, Hypoglycemic Agents, Middle Aged, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review