Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults: a guide for the perplexed
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lack of firm diagnostic criteria for LADA, including retrospective criteria and similarities between patients with type 1 diabetes and LADA, have stunted enthusiasm for adopting it as a novel category for diabetes.
“The lack of firm diagnostic criteria for LADA, including retrospective criteria and similarities between patients with type 1 diabetes and LADA, have stunted enthusiasm for adopting it as a novel category for diabetes.40”
From Type 1 diabetes (2014) · cites this paper as [40]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Fourlanos S, Dotta F, Greenbaum CJ et al (2005) Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) should be less latent. Diabetologia DOI 10.1007/s00125-005-1960-7 · DOI
- Bingley PJ, Bonifacio E, Gale EAM (1999) Predicting type 1 diabetes. In: Marshall SM, Home PD, Rizza RA (eds) Diabetes Annual/12. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1-20
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Atkinson, M. A., Eisenbarth, G. S., & Michels, A. W. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60591-7 · Cited by 2,713 · see citing works
Gale, E. A. M. (2006) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-006-0348-7 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationWITHDRAWN: Reprint of: Classification of diabetes mellitus
Adler, A., Bennett, P., Chair, S. C., Gregg, E., Venkat Narayan, K. M., Schmidt, M. I., Sobngwi, E., Tajima, N., Tandon, N., Unwin, N., et al. (2021) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108972 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Retracted
- Authors
- Gale, E. A. M.
- Affiliations
- Southmead Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gale, E. A. M.
- Venue
- Diabetologia
- Published
- 2005-09-29
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2195-2199
- ISSN
- 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0428
- OpenAlex
- W2065939874
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Keywords
- latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, maturity-onset diabetes of the young, differential diagnosis, islet autoantibodies, HLA, age of onset, insulin deficiency
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Autoantibodies, C-Peptide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Genetic Markers, Glutamate Decarboxylase, Humans, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Terminology as Topic, Predictive Value of Tests, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
