Cited by 712Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Medical management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes

Open access
Nathan, D. M., Buse, J. B., Davidson, M. B., Ferrannini, E., Holman, R. R., Sherwin, R., Zinman, B.·2009·Diabetologia

Abstract

The consensus algorithm for the medical management of type 2 diabetes was published in August 2006 with the expectation that it would be updated, based on the availability of new interventions and new evidence to establish their clinical role. The authors continue to endorse the principles used to develop the algorithm and its major features. We are sensitive to the risks of changing the algorithm cavalierly or too frequently, without compelling new information. An update to the consensus algorithm published in January 2008 specifically addressed safety issues surrounding the thiazolidinediones. In this revision, we focus on the new classes of medications that now have more clinical data and experience.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-008-1157-y

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Metformin reduces fasting glucose mainly through its effect on hepatic glucose output.

    “Metformin reduces fasting glucose mainly through its effect on hepatic glucose output.95”

    From Prediabetes: a high-risk state for diabetes development (2012) · cites this paper as [95]

  • Glitazones such as troglitazone, rosiglitazone, and pioglitazone act through the PPAR-γ receptor by increasing hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity and preserving insulin secretion.

    “The glitazones, such as troglitazone, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, act through the PPAR-γ receptor by increasing hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity and preserving insulin secretion.45,95”

    From Prediabetes: a high-risk state for diabetes development (2012) · cites this paper as [95]

  • α-glucosidase inhibitors reduce the rate of polysaccharide digestion from the proximal small intestine and primarily lower postprandial glucose without causing hypoglycaemia.

    “α-glucosidase inhibitors reduce the rate of polysaccharide digestion from the proximal small intestine. They primarily lower postprandial glucose without causing hypoglycaemia.”

    From Prediabetes: a high-risk state for diabetes development (2012) · cites this paper as [95]

  • Because their effect on A1c is smaller than that of other oral antidiabetic agents, α-glucosidase inhibitors are seldom used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

    “Since their effect on A1c is smaller than that of other oral antidiabetic agents, they are seldom used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.95”

    From Prediabetes: a high-risk state for diabetes development (2012) · cites this paper as [95]

  • Troglitazone was withdrawn from the European market for probable serious hepatotoxicity, and rosiglitazone for possible increases in cardiovascular risk.

    “Two thiazolidinedione drugs were withdrawn from the European market, troglitazone for probable serious hepatotoxicity, and rosiglitazone due to possible increases in cardiovascular risk.45,95”

    From Prediabetes: a high-risk state for diabetes development (2012) · cites this paper as [95]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 118 · Cited by 712

Authors
Nathan, D. M., Buse, J. B., Davidson, M. B., Ferrannini, E., Holman, R. R., Sherwin, R., & Zinman, B.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (US)
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Nathan, D. M.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2008-10-22
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
17-30
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2139562487
Cited by
712
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 115
FWCI
62.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Insulet Corporation
  • MannKind Corporation
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Servier
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, hyperglycemia, medical management, consensus algorithms, thiazolidinediones, drug safety
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Europe, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Life Style, Societies, Medical, United States, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review