Cited by 155Diabetes Management and EducationMental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Healthcare costs in patients with diabetes mellitus and comorbid mental disorders—a systematic review

Hutter, N., Schnurr, A., Baumeister, H.·2010·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis We systematically reviewed the impact of comorbid mental disorders on healthcare costs in persons with diabetes. Method We conducted a comprehensive search for studies investigating adult persons (≥ 18 years old) with diabetes mellitus. All studies that allowed comparison of healthcare costs between diabetic patients with mental disorders and those without were included. Results We identified 4,273 potentially relevant articles from a comprehensive database search. Of these, 31 primary studies (39 publications) fulfilled inclusion criteria, of which 27 examined comorbid depression. Hospitalisation rates and hospitalisation costs, frequency and costs of outpatient visits, emergency department visits, medication costs and total healthcare costs were mainly increased with small to moderate effect sizes in patients with diabetes and comorbid mental disorders compared with diabetic patients without such problems. Frequency (standardised mean difference [SMD] =0.35-1.26) and costs (SMD =0.33-0.85) of mental health specialist visits were increased in the group with mental health comorbidity. Results regarding diabetes-related preventive services were inconsistent but point to a reduced utilisation rate in diabetic patients with comorbid mental disorders. Statistical heterogeneity between studies was high (I (2) range 64-98%). Pooled overall effects are therefore not reported. Studies included differ substantially regarding sample selection, assessment of diabetes and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-010-1873-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 66 · Cited by 155

Authors
Hutter, N., Schnurr, A., & Baumeister, H.
Affiliations
University of Freiburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Hutter, N.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2010-08-11
Volume
53
Issue
12
Pages
2470-2479
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W1973149900
Cited by
155
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, mental illness, comorbidities, health care costs, depression, hospital costs, outpatient visits, emergency department visits, drug costs, preventive services
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Adult, Algorithms, Mental Disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Health Expenditures, Hospitalization, Humans, Preventive Medicine, Comorbidity, Health Care Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review