Cited by 216Pancreatic function and diabetesPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchDiabetes and associated disorders

Maturation and function of human embryonic stem cell-derived pancreatic progenitors in macroencapsulation devices following transplant into mice

Bruin, Jennifer E., Rezania, Alireza, Xu, Jean, Narayan, Kavitha, Fox, Jessica K., O’Neil, John J., Kieffer, Timothy J.·2013·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis Islet transplantation is a promising cell therapy for patients with diabetes, but it is currently limited by the reliance upon cadaveric donor tissue. We previously demonstrated that human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived pancreatic progenitor cells matured under the kidney capsule in a mouse model of diabetes into glucose-responsive insulin-secreting cells capable of reversing diabetes. However, the formation of cells resembling bone and cartilage was a major limitation of that study. Therefore, we developed an improved differentiation protocol that aimed to prevent the formation of off-target mesoderm tissue following transplantation. We also examined how variation within the complex host environment influenced the development of pancreatic progenitors in vivo. Methods The hESCs were differentiated for 14 days into pancreatic progenitor cells and transplanted either under the kidney capsule or within Theracyte (TheraCyte, Laguna Hills, CA, USA) devices into diabetic mice. Results Our revised differentiation protocol successfully eliminated the formation of non-endodermal cell populations in 99% of transplanted mice and generated grafts containing >80% endocrine cells. Progenitor cells developed efficiently into pancreatic endocrine tissue within macroencapsulation devices, despite lacking direct contact with the host environment, and reversed diabetes within 3 months. The preparation of cell aggregates pre-transplant was critical for the formation of insul…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-013-2955-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 55 · Cited by 216

Authors
Bruin, J. E., Rezania, A., Xu, J., Narayan, K., Fox, J. K., O’Neil, J. J., & Kieffer, T. J.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Janssen Research & Development (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Kieffer, Timothy J.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2013-06-16
Volume
56
Issue
9
Pages
1987-1998
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2024090459
Cited by
216
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 4
FWCI
21.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Janssen Research and Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
human embryonic stem cells, pancreatic progenitor cells, macroencapsulation, islet transplantation, diabetes mellitus, cell differentiation protocol, kidney capsule transplantation, cell aggregates, glucose-dependent insulin secretion, exendin-4, cell therapy
MeSH terms
Exenatide, Animals, Cell Line, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Pancreas, Peptides, Stem Cells, Venoms, Mice, SCID, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review