Dysregulation of muscle glycogen synthase in recovery from exercise in type 2 diabetes.
Open accessAbstract
Aims/hypothesis Insulin and exercise stimulate skeletal muscle glycogen synthase (GS) activity by dephosphorylation and changes in kinetic properties. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of insulin, exercise and post-exercise insulin stimulation on GS phosphorylation, activity and substrate affinity in obesity and type 2 diabetes.Methods Obese men with type 2 diabetes (n = 13) and weight-matched controls (n = 14) underwent euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamps in the rested state and 3 h after 60 min of cycling (70% maximal pulmonary oxygen uptake [VO2max]). Biopsies from vastus lateralis muscle were obtained before and after clamps, and before and immediately after exercise.Results Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was lower in diabetic patients vs obese controls with or without prior exercise. Post exercise, glucose partitioning shifted away from oxidation and towards storage in both groups. Insulin and, more potently, exercise increased GS activity (fractional velocity [FV]) and substrate affinity in both groups. Both stimuli caused dephosphorylation of GS at sites 3a + 3b, with exercise additionally decreasing phosphorylation at sites 2 + 2a. In both groups, changes in GS activity, substrate affinity and dephosphorylation at sites 3a + 3b by exercise were sustained 3 h post exercise and further enhanced by insulin. Post exercise, reduced GS activity and substrate affinity as well as increased phosphorylation at sites 2 + 2a were found in diabetic patients vs obese controls.Conclusions/interpretation Exercise-induced activation of muscle GS in obesity and type 2 diabetes involves dephosphorylation of GS at sites 3a + 3b and 2 + 2a and enhanced substrate affinity, which is likely to facilitate glucose partitioning towards storage. Lower GS activity and increased phosphorylation at sites 2 + 2a in type 2 diabetes in the recovery period imply an impaired response to exercise.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A single MICT session consisting of cycling for 60 min at 70% VO2max reduced the glycogen amount by 50% in muscles.
“A single MICT session consisting of cycling for 60 min at 70% VO2max reduced the glycogen amount by 50% in muscles”
From Effect of Exercise Training on Fat Loss—Energetic Perspectives and the Role of Improved Adipose Tissue Function and Body Fat Distribution (2021) · cites this paper as Pedersen et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Pedersen, A. J. T., Hingst, J. R., Friedrichsen, M., Kristensen, J. M., Højlund, K., & Wojtaszewski, J. F. P.
- Affiliations
- Odense University Hospital (DK)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Wojtaszewski, Jørgen F. P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetologia
- Published
- 2015-04-14
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1569-1578
- ISSN
- 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0428
- OpenAlex
- W1977322694
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Sundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd
- European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes
- Novo Nordisk
- Odense Universitetshospital
- Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF14OC0012009)
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Keywords
- glycogen synthase, type 2 diabetes, obesity, post-exercise recovery, insulin-stimulated glucose uptake, glycogen synthase phosphorylation, substrate affinity, vastus lateralis, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp
- MeSH terms
- Bicycling, Biopsy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycogen, Glycogen Synthase, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Kinetics, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Phosphorylation, Uridine Diphosphate Glucose, Glucose Clamp Technique, Cohort Studies, Exercise, Muscle, Skeletal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review