Twelve week liraglutide or sitagliptin does not affect hepatic fat in type 2 diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
Glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1-based therapies have been suggested to improve hepatic steatosis. We assessed the effects of the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide and the dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor sitagliptin on hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. In this 12 week, parallel, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, performed at the VU University Medical Center between July 2013 and August 2015, 52 overweight patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin and/or sulphonylurea agent ([mean ± SD] age 62.7 ± 6.9 years, HbA 1c 7.3 ± 0.7% or 56 ± 1 mmol/mol) were allocated to once daily liraglutide 1.8 mg ( n = 17), sitagliptin 100 mg ( n = 18) or matching placebos ( n = 17) by computer generated numbers. Both participants and researchers were blinded to group assignment. Hepatic fat content was measured using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( 1 H-MRS). Hepatic fibrosis was estimated using three validated formulae. One patient dropped out in the sitagliptin group owing to dizziness, but no serious adverse events occurred. At week 12, no between-group differences in hepatic steatosis were found. Liraglutide reduced steatosis by 10% (20.9 ± 3.4% to 18.8 ± 3.3%), sitagliptin reduced steatosis by 12.1% (23.9 ± 3.0% to 21.0 ± 2.7%) and placebo lessened it by 9.5% (18.7 ± 2.7% to 16.9 ± 2.7%). Neither drug affected hepatic fibrosis scores compared with placebo. Twelve-week liraglutide or sitagliptin treatment does not reduce hepatic steatosis or fibrosis in type 2 diabetes. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01744236 Funded by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 282521 – the SAFEGUARD project.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The observed reduction in liver fat content (6.2%) in the GLP-1RA arm is similar to previous studies in people with MASLD.
“the observed reduction in liver fat content (6.2%) in the GLP-1RA arm is similar to previous studies in people with MASLD,23,24”
From Randomised trial comparing weight loss through lifestyle and GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in people with MASLD (2025) · cites this paper as [23]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 142
- Authors
- Smits, M. M., Tonneijck, L., Muskiet, M. H. A., Kramer, M. H. H., Pouwels, P. J. W., Pieters-van den Bos, I. C., Hoekstra, T., Diamant, M., van Raalte, D. H., & Cahen, D. L.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Smits, Mark M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetologia
- Published
- 2016-09-15
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2588-2593
- ISSN
- 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0428
- PMC
- PMC6518065
- OpenAlex
- W2520975418
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 13.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetologia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Seventh Framework Programme (282521)
- Novo Nordisk
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- liraglutide, sitagliptin, hepatic steatosis, liver fat, liver fibrosis, type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, 1H NMR, metformin, sulfonylureas, overweight patients, liver fibrosis score, HbA1c
- MeSH terms
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Sitagliptin Phosphate, Liraglutide, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Middle Aged, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review