Cited by 142Diabetes Treatment and ManagementLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Twelve week liraglutide or sitagliptin does not affect hepatic fat in type 2 diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial

Open access
Smits, Mark M., Tonneijck, Lennart, Muskiet, Marcel H. A., Kramer, Mark H. H., Pouwels, Petra J. W., Pieters-van den Bos, Indra C., Hoekstra, Trynke, Diamant, Michaela +2 more·2016·Diabetologia

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1-based therapies have been suggested to improve hepatic steatosis. We assessed the effects of the GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide and the dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor sitagliptin on hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. In this 12 week, parallel, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, performed at the VU University Medical Center between July 2013 and August 2015, 52 overweight patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin and/or sulphonylurea agent ([mean ± SD] age 62.7 ± 6.9 years, HbA 1c 7.3 ± 0.7% or 56 ± 1 mmol/mol) were allocated to once daily liraglutide 1.8 mg ( n = 17), sitagliptin 100 mg ( n = 18) or matching placebos ( n = 17) by computer generated numbers. Both participants and researchers were blinded to group assignment. Hepatic fat content was measured using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ( 1 H-MRS). Hepatic fibrosis was estimated using three validated formulae. One patient dropped out in the sitagliptin group owing to dizziness, but no serious adverse events occurred. At week 12, no between-group differences in hepatic steatosis were found. Liraglutide reduced steatosis by 10% (20.9 ± 3.4% to 18.8 ± 3.3%), sitagliptin reduced steatosis by 12.1% (23.9 ± 3.0% to 21.0 ± 2.7%) and placebo lessened it by 9.5% (18.7 ± 2.7% to 16.9 ± 2.7%). Neither drug affected hepatic fibrosis scores compared with placebo. Twelve-week liraglutide or sitagliptin treatment does not reduce hepatic steatosis or fibrosis in type 2 diabetes. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01744236 Funded by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 282521 – the SAFEGUARD project.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-016-4100-7

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 142

Authors
Smits, M. M., Tonneijck, L., Muskiet, M. H. A., Kramer, M. H. H., Pouwels, P. J. W., Pieters-van den Bos, I. C., Hoekstra, T., Diamant, M., van Raalte, D. H., & Cahen, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Smits, Mark M.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2016-09-15
Volume
59
Issue
12
Pages
2588-2593
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2520975418
Cited by
142
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3
FWCI
13.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Seventh Framework Programme (282521)
  • Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
liraglutide, sitagliptin, hepatic steatosis, liver fat, liver fibrosis, type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, 1H NMR, metformin, sulfonylureas, overweight patients, liver fibrosis score, HbA1c
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Sitagliptin Phosphate, Liraglutide, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Middle Aged, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review