Cited by 30Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Ambulatory blood pressure and arterial stiffness in individuals with type 1 diabetes

Open access
on behalf of the FinnDiane Study Group, Lithovius, Raija, Gordin, Daniel, Forsblom, Carol, Saraheimo, Markku, Harjutsalo, Valma, Groop, Per-Henrik·2018·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis This study aimed to assess the use of ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) to identify the presence of masked, nocturnal and white-coat hypertension in individuals with type 1 diabetes, patterns that could not be detected by regular office-based BP monitoring alone. We also analysed associations between BP patterns and arterial stiffness in order to identify individuals at cardiovascular risk.Methods This substudy included 140 individuals with type 1 diabetes from the Helsinki metropolitan area, who attended the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study (FinnDiane) Centre in Helsinki between January 2013 and August 2017. Twenty-four hour ABPM and pulse wave analysis were performed simultaneously using a validated non-invasive brachial oscillometric device (Mobil-O-Graph). Definitions of hypertension were based on the European Society of Hypertension guidelines. Masked hypertension was defined as normal office BP (BP obtained using a standardised automated BP device) but elevated 24 h ABPM, and white-coat hypertension as elevated office BP but normal 24 h ABPM.Results A total of 38% of individuals were normotensive and 33% had sustained hypertension, while 23% had masked and 6% had white-coat hypertension. About half of the cohort had increased absolute levels of night-time BP, half of whom were untreated. In the ambulatory setting, central BP and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were higher in participants with masked hypertension than in those with normotension (p ≤ 0.001). In a multivariable linear regression model adjusted for age, sex, BMI, antihypertensive treatment and eGFR, masked hypertension was independently associated with higher 24 h PWV (β 0.50 [95% CI 0.34, 0.66]), but not with PWV obtained during resting conditions (adjusted β 0.28 [95% CI -0.53, 1.10]), using normotension as the reference group.Conclusions/interpretation ABPM analysis revealed that one-quarter of the participants with type 1 diabetes had masked hypertension; these individuals would not have been detected by office BP alone. Moreover, arterial stiffness was increased in individuals with masked hypertension. These findings support the use of ABPM to identify individuals at risk of cardiovascular disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-018-4648-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For GLP-1 RAs, despite showing potential in reducing HbA1c and weight in patients with T1DM in the ADJUNCT ONE trial, concerns have been raised about increased rates of symptomatic hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia with ketosis.

    “For GLP-1 RAs, despite showing potential in reducing HbA1c and weight in patients with T1DM in the ADJUNCT ONE (The Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide as Adjunct Therapy to Insulin in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes) Treat-To-Target trial, concerns have been raised about increased rates of symptomatic hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia with ketosis.801”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 30

Authors
on behalf of the FinnDiane Study Group, Lithovius, R., Gordin, D., Forsblom, C., Saraheimo, M., Harjutsalo, V., & Groop, P.-H.
Affiliations
  • Folkhälsans Forskningscentrum (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Joslin Diabetes Center (US)
Corresponding author
Groop, Per-Henrik
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2018-05-24
Volume
61
Issue
9
Pages
1935-1945
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2804663379
Cited by
30
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
  • WOS
Funders
  • Helsingin Yliopisto
  • European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes
  • Samfundet Folkhälsan
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, masked hypertension, white coat hypertension, nocturnal hypertension, arterial stiffness, pulse wave velocity, central blood pressure, cardiovascular risk, hypertension detection
MeSH terms
Adult, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetic Nephropathies, Female, Finland, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Vascular Stiffness, Masked Hypertension, Pulse Wave Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review