Cited by 42Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsHealth disparities and outcomesDiabetes Management and Research

Racial differences in all-cause mortality and future complications among people with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from more than 2.4 million individuals

Ezzatvar, Yasmin, Ramírez-Vélez, Robinson, Izquierdo, Mikel, García-Hermoso, Antonio·2021·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis The aim of this work was to quantify racial/ethnic differences in risk for future diabetic complications and all-cause mortality by performing a meta-analysis of prospective studies.Methods A systematic search in PubMed and EMBASE was performed from inception to May 2021. Prospective cohort studies that reported HRs and associated 95% CIs of diabetes complications and all-cause mortality among racial/ethnic groups, with White people as the reference group, were included. Study characteristics and HR estimates were extracted from each study. Estimates were pooled using random-effects inverse-variance model with the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman variance estimator.Results A total of 23 studies were included, comprising 2,416,516 individuals diagnosed with diabetes (White 59.3%, Black 11.2%, Asian 1.3%, Hispanic-American 2.4%, Native American 0.2%, East Asian 1.9%, South Asian 0.8%, Pacific Islander 2.3%, Māori 2.4% and others 18.2%). Compared with White individuals with diabetes, individuals of Māori ethnicity were at higher risk for all-cause mortality (HR 1.88 [95% CI 1.61, 2.21]; I 2 = 7.1%), Hispanic-American individuals had a significantly lower risk for CVD (HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.53, 0.81]; I 2 = 0%) and Black individuals had higher risk for end-stage renal disease (HR 1.54 [95% CI 1.05, 2.24]; I 2 = 95.4%). No significant higher risk for diabetes complications was found in other racial/ethnic groups relative to White people.Conclusions/interpretation Racial/ethnic differences exist in the risk for future diabetic complications and all-cause mortality. Our results support the use of such categories for international diabetes clinical guideline recommendations until better predictors become available. Efforts to identify high-risk groups and to better control cardiovascular risk factors across ethnically diverse populations are therefore needed.Registration PROSPERO registration ID CRD42021239274.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-021-05554-9

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Black individuals have higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and premature coronary artery disease, along with worse cardiovascular outcomes.

    “This gap is especially concerning given the higher prevalence of T2DM, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and premature CAD among Black individuals, along with worse cardiovascular outcomes [14,15].”

    From Unequal Access to Evidence-Based Cardiometabolic Therapies: Racial Disparities in SGLT2 Inhibitor and GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Use Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease (2026) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Synthesis of results (p. 8) finds a higher risk of end-stage renal disease among Black people with diabetes, supporting a renal-disparity component, but it measures future risk rather than chronic kidney disease prevalence. It reports a lower risk of coronary artery disease for Black participants with diabetes (HR 0.76), contrary to the claimed direction for CAD; it does not establish higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes or heart failure, premature CAD, or worse cardiovascular outcomes overall. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 42

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]7. Muka T, Glisic M, Milic J et al (2020) A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and

Authors
Ezzatvar, Y., Ramírez-Vélez, R., Izquierdo, M., & García-Hermoso, A.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2021-08-28
Volume
64
Issue
11
Pages
2389-2401
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W3197729683
Cited by
42
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
racial and ethnic disparities, diabetes complications, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, end-stage renal disease, Māori, Hispanic Americans, Black people
MeSH terms
Race Factors, Cause of Death, Diabetes Mellitus, Ethnicity, Humans, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Racial Groups, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review