Validation of the classification for type 2 diabetes into five subgroups: a report from the ORIGIN trial
Open accessAbstract
Aims/hypothesis Data analyses from Swedish individuals with newly diagnosed diabetes have suggested that diabetes could be classified into five subtypes that differ with respect to the progression of dysglycaemia and the incidence of diabetes consequences. We assessed this classification in a multiethnic cohort of participants with established and newly diagnosed diabetes, randomly allocated to insulin glargine vs standard care.Methods In total, 7017 participants from the Outcome Reduction with Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial were assigned to the five predefined diabetes subtypes (namely, severe auto-immune diabetes, severe insulin-deficient diabetes, severe insulin-resistant diabetes, mild obesity-related diabetes, mild age-related diabetes) based on the age at diabetes diagnosis, BMI, HbA 1c, fasting C-peptide levels and the presence of glutamate decarboxylase antibodies at baseline. Differences between diabetes subtypes in cardiovascular and renal outcomes were investigated using Cox regression models for a median follow-up of 6.2 years. We also compared the effect of glargine vs standard care on hyperglycaemia, defined by having a mean post-randomisation HbA 1c ≥6.5%, between subtypes.Results The five diabetes subtypes were replicated in the ORIGIN trial and exhibited similar baseline characteristics in Europeans and Latin Americans, compared with the initially described clusters in the Swedish cohort. We confirmed differences in renal outcomes, with a higher incidence of events in the severe insulin-resistant diabetes subtype compared with the mild age-related diabetes subtype (i.e., chronic kidney disease stage 3A: HR 1.49 [95% CI 1.31, 1.71]; stage 3B: HR 2.25 [1.82, 2.78]; macroalbuminuria: HR 1.56 [1.22, 1.99]). No differences were observed in the incidence of retinopathy and cardiovascular diseases after adjusting for multiple hypothesis testing. Diabetes subtypes also differed in glycaemic response to glargine, with a particular benefit of receiving glargine (vs standard care) in the severe insulin-deficient diabetes subtype compared with the mild age-related diabetes subtype, with a decreased occurrence of hyperglycaemia by 13% (OR 1.36 [1.30, 1.41] on glargine; OR 1.49 [1.43, 1.57] on standard care; p for interaction subtype × intervention = 0.001).Conclusions/interpretation Cluster analysis enabled the characterisation of five subtypes of diabetes in a multiethnic cohort. Both the incidence of renal outcomes and the response to insulin varied between diabetes subtypes. These findings reinforce the clinical utility of applying precision medicine to predict comorbidities and treatment responses in individuals with diabetes.Trial registration ORIGIN trial, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00069784.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Type 2 diabetes is a very heterogeneous disease with variable age at onset, related degree of obesity, insulin resistance, and tendency to develop complications.
“Type 2 diabetes is a very heterogeneous disease with variable age at onset, related degree of obesity, insulin resistance, and tendency to develop complications (39,40).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 79
- Authors
- Pigeyre, M., Hess, S., Gomez, M. F., Asplund, O., Groop, L., Paré, G., & Gerstein, H.
- Affiliations
- Population Health Research Institute (CA)
- Sanofi (Germany) (DE)
- Lund University (SE)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Pigeyre, Marie
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetologia
- Published
- 2021-10-21
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 206-215
- ISSN
- 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0428
- OpenAlex
- W3206761891
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10
- FWCI
- 8.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (LUDC-IRC 15-0067)
- McMaster University (E.J. Moran Campbell Internal Career Research Award)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (125794)
- Swedish Research Council (2018-02837; 2014-03352; EXODIAB 2009-1039)
- Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation (20160872)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, diabetes subtypes, insulin glargine, ORIGIN trial, insulin-deficient diabetes, obesity-related diabetes, age-related diabetes, glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies, C-peptide, chronic kidney disease, macroalbuminuria, retinopathy, cardiovascular outcomes, hyperglycemia, glycemic control
- MeSH terms
- Insulin Glargine, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Treatment Outcome, Insulin, Long-Acting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review