Cited by 75Diabetes Treatment and ManagementChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesAcute Kidney Injury Research

Separate and combined effects of semaglutide and empagliflozin on kidney oxygenation and perfusion in people with type 2 diabetes: a randomised trial

Open access
Gullaksen, Søren, Vernstrøm, Liv, Sørensen, Steffen S., Ringgaard, Steffen, Laustsen, Christoffer, Funck, Kristian L., Poulsen, Per L., Laugesen, Esben·2023·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1ras) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have shown kidney-protective effects. Improved kidney oxygenation and haemodynamic changes are suggested mechanisms; however, human data are scarce. We therefore investigated whether semaglutide (GLP-1ra), empagliflozin (SGLT2i) or their combination improve kidney oxygenation and perfusion. Methods The trial was undertaken at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. A total of 120 people with type 2 diabetes (HbA 1c ≥48 mmol/mol [6.5%]) and at high risk of CVD (age ≥50 years) were randomised into four parallel groups (n=30 in each group) for 32 weeks: 1.0 mg semaglutide (open label); 10 mg empagliflozin (blinded to participants, caregivers, examiners and outcome assessors); their combination (1.0 mg semaglutide open label plus 10 mg empagliflozin blinded to participants, caregivers, examiners and outcome assessors); and placebo tablet (blinded to participants, caregivers, examiners and outcome assessors). Sequentially numbered, sealed envelopes containing computer-generated randomisation codes, provided by Glostrup Pharmacy, Glostrup, Denmark, determined the intervention. The two co-primary outcomes were change in kidney oxygenation and change in arterial stiffness. This paper reports on kidney oxygenation, for which 80 individuals as prespecified, 20 in each group, underwent MRI. We primarily hypothesised that kidney oxygenation would be improved in the active treatment groups compared with placebo after 32 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in kidney perfusion, erythropoietin, haematocrit, urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) and GFR (measured using technetium-99m) compared with baseline and between treatment groups at week 32. Results Our model estimated a common baseline R2* value across all four groups in the cortex and the medulla. At baseline, the value was 24.5 (95% CI 23.9, 24.9) Hz in the medulla. After 32 weeks, the R2* values in the medulla were estimated to be 25.4 (95% CI 24.7, 26.2) Hz in the empagliflozin group and 24.5 (95% CI 23.9, 25.1) Hz in the placebo group (p=0.016) (higher R2* corresponds to a lower oxygenation). Semaglutide decreased perfusion in both the cortex and the medulla. Empagliflozin increased erythropoietin and haematocrit. All three active treatments decreased GFR but not UACR. Ten serious adverse events were reported, among them two occurrences of semaglutide-associated obstipation. Conclusions/interpretation Our hypothesis, that semaglutide, empagliflozin or their combination improve kidney oxygenation, was rejected. On the contrary, empagliflozin induced a reduction in medullary kidney oxygenation. Semaglutide substantially reduced kidney perfusion without affecting oxygenation. Trial registration Clinicaltrialsregister.eu EudraCT 2019-000781-38 FUNDING: Novo Nordisk Foundation, Central Denmark Region Research Fund and Danish Medical Associations Research Foundation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-023-05876-w

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 75

Authors
Gullaksen, S., Vernstrøm, L., Sørensen, S. S., Ringgaard, S., Laustsen, C., Funck, K. L., Poulsen, P. L., & Laugesen, E.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Gullaksen, Søren
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2023-02-06
Volume
66
Issue
5
Pages
813-825
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W4319301007
Cited by
75
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14
FWCI
13.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • The Central Denmark Region Research Fund
  • Danish Medical Associations Research Foundation
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
semaglutide, empagliflozin, combination therapy, type 2 diabetes, kidney oxygenation, renal perfusion, R2* MRI, arterial stiffness, erythropoietin, hematocrit, albuminuria, glomerular filtration rate, renal protection, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, cardiovascular risk, renal hemodynamics
MeSH terms
Semaglutide, Benzhydryl Compounds, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Erythropoietin, Glucosides, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Kidney, Middle Aged, Perfusion, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review