Separate and combined effects of semaglutide and empagliflozin on kidney oxygenation and perfusion in people with type 2 diabetes: a randomised trial
Open accessAbstract
Aims/hypothesis Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1ras) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have shown kidney-protective effects. Improved kidney oxygenation and haemodynamic changes are suggested mechanisms; however, human data are scarce. We therefore investigated whether semaglutide (GLP-1ra), empagliflozin (SGLT2i) or their combination improve kidney oxygenation and perfusion. Methods The trial was undertaken at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. A total of 120 people with type 2 diabetes (HbA 1c ≥48 mmol/mol [6.5%]) and at high risk of CVD (age ≥50 years) were randomised into four parallel groups (n=30 in each group) for 32 weeks: 1.0 mg semaglutide (open label); 10 mg empagliflozin (blinded to participants, caregivers, examiners and outcome assessors); their combination (1.0 mg semaglutide open label plus 10 mg empagliflozin blinded to participants, caregivers, examiners and outcome assessors); and placebo tablet (blinded to participants, caregivers, examiners and outcome assessors). Sequentially numbered, sealed envelopes containing computer-generated randomisation codes, provided by Glostrup Pharmacy, Glostrup, Denmark, determined the intervention. The two co-primary outcomes were change in kidney oxygenation and change in arterial stiffness. This paper reports on kidney oxygenation, for which 80 individuals as prespecified, 20 in each group, underwent MRI. We primarily hypothesised that kidney oxygenation would be improved in the active treatment groups compared with placebo after 32 weeks. Secondary outcomes included changes in kidney perfusion, erythropoietin, haematocrit, urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) and GFR (measured using technetium-99m) compared with baseline and between treatment groups at week 32. Results Our model estimated a common baseline R2* value across all four groups in the cortex and the medulla. At baseline, the value was 24.5 (95% CI 23.9, 24.9) Hz in the medulla. After 32 weeks, the R2* values in the medulla were estimated to be 25.4 (95% CI 24.7, 26.2) Hz in the empagliflozin group and 24.5 (95% CI 23.9, 25.1) Hz in the placebo group (p=0.016) (higher R2* corresponds to a lower oxygenation). Semaglutide decreased perfusion in both the cortex and the medulla. Empagliflozin increased erythropoietin and haematocrit. All three active treatments decreased GFR but not UACR. Ten serious adverse events were reported, among them two occurrences of semaglutide-associated obstipation. Conclusions/interpretation Our hypothesis, that semaglutide, empagliflozin or their combination improve kidney oxygenation, was rejected. On the contrary, empagliflozin induced a reduction in medullary kidney oxygenation. Semaglutide substantially reduced kidney perfusion without affecting oxygenation. Trial registration Clinicaltrialsregister.eu EudraCT 2019-000781-38 FUNDING: Novo Nordisk Foundation, Central Denmark Region Research Fund and Danish Medical Associations Research Foundation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In both studies, oxygen availability as assessed by BOLD-MRI was not changed.
“In both studies, oxygen availability as assessed by BOLD-MRI was not changed.”
From GLP-1 agonists in the treatment of chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes and obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [41]
Prolonged treatment with the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide lowered perfusion compared with placebo.
“In contrast, prolonged treatment with the GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide lowered perfusion compared with placebo (41).”
From GLP-1 agonists in the treatment of chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes and obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [41]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 75
- Authors
- Gullaksen, S., Vernstrøm, L., Sørensen, S. S., Ringgaard, S., Laustsen, C., Funck, K. L., Poulsen, P. L., & Laugesen, E.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Gullaksen, Søren
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetologia
- Published
- 2023-02-06
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 813-825
- ISSN
- 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0428
- OpenAlex
- W4319301007
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14
- FWCI
- 13.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2024-05-13)
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- The Central Denmark Region Research Fund
- Danish Medical Associations Research Foundation
- Novo Nordisk Fonden
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
- Keywords
- semaglutide, empagliflozin, combination therapy, type 2 diabetes, kidney oxygenation, renal perfusion, R2* MRI, arterial stiffness, erythropoietin, hematocrit, albuminuria, glomerular filtration rate, renal protection, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, cardiovascular risk, renal hemodynamics
- MeSH terms
- Semaglutide, Benzhydryl Compounds, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Erythropoietin, Glucosides, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Kidney, Middle Aged, Perfusion, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review