Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is associated with reduced insulin-induced suppression of glucagon concentrations
Open accessAbstract
Aims/hypothesis We aimed to examine whether impaired glucose tolerance is associated with reduced suppression of glucagon concentrations. Methods Eighty-four non-diabetic women of Caucasian origin and 61 years of age, of whom 48 had normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and 36 had IGT, underwent a 75 g OGTT and a hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp with measurement of glucagon, insulin and glucose concentrations. Results At 2 h after 75 g oral glucose, glucagon concentrations were reduced by 7.1 +/- 1.1 ng/l in NGT vs 8.0 +/- 1.4 ng/l in IGT, (NS). However, the 2 h reductions in glucagon per mmol/l increase in 2 h glucose or per pmol/l increase in 2 h insulin were both impaired in IGT (p = 0.002 and p = 0.043, respectively) because the 2 h increases in glucose and insulin were higher in IGT than in NGT. Furthermore, suppression of glucagon concentrations during a euglycaemic clamp at hyperinsulinaemic concentrations (NGT: 607 +/- 19 pmol/l, IGT: 561 +/- 21 pmol/l) was lower in IGT (13.6 +/- 1.6 ng/l) than in NGT (23.1 +/- 1.2 ng/l; p < 0.001). The suppression of glucagon concentrations during the hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp correlated with insulin sensitivity (r = 0.24, p = 0.027) and with the 2 h glucose value during the OGTT (r = -0.52, p < 0.001). Conclusion/interpretation Impaired glucose tolerance is associated with reduced insulin-induced suppression of glucagon secretion, which could be caused by A-cell insulin resistance. Inappropriately high glucagon secretion could therefore contribute to the metabolic perturbations in IGT.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Defective suppression of glucagon secretion has been found in impaired glucose tolerance.
“defective suppression has been also found in impaired glucose tolerance (9)”
From Mathematical Model of Glucagon Kinetics for the Assessment of Insulin-Mediated Glucagon Inhibition During an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 95
- Authors
- Ahr�n, B., & Larsson, H.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- ORCID
- Larsson, H.
- Venue
- Diabetologia
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1998-2003
- ISSN
- 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0428
- OpenAlex
- W2056907495
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Lunds Universitet
- Novo Nordisk
- Malmö Högskola
- Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
- Medical Research Council
- Medicinska Fakulteten, Lunds Universitet
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- impaired glucose tolerance, glucagon secretion, insulin sensitivity, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, oral glucose tolerance test, non-diabetic women, prediabetes
- MeSH terms
- Cholesterol, Female, Glucagon, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Sweden, Triglycerides, Glucose Clamp Technique, Body Mass Index, Postmenopause, Glucose Intolerance, Area Under Curve, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review