Cited by 95Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is associated with reduced insulin-induced suppression of glucagon concentrations

Open access
Ahr�n, B., Larsson, H.·2001·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis We aimed to examine whether impaired glucose tolerance is associated with reduced suppression of glucagon concentrations. Methods Eighty-four non-diabetic women of Caucasian origin and 61 years of age, of whom 48 had normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and 36 had IGT, underwent a 75 g OGTT and a hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp with measurement of glucagon, insulin and glucose concentrations. Results At 2 h after 75 g oral glucose, glucagon concentrations were reduced by 7.1 +/- 1.1 ng/l in NGT vs 8.0 +/- 1.4 ng/l in IGT, (NS). However, the 2 h reductions in glucagon per mmol/l increase in 2 h glucose or per pmol/l increase in 2 h insulin were both impaired in IGT (p = 0.002 and p = 0.043, respectively) because the 2 h increases in glucose and insulin were higher in IGT than in NGT. Furthermore, suppression of glucagon concentrations during a euglycaemic clamp at hyperinsulinaemic concentrations (NGT: 607 +/- 19 pmol/l, IGT: 561 +/- 21 pmol/l) was lower in IGT (13.6 +/- 1.6 ng/l) than in NGT (23.1 +/- 1.2 ng/l; p < 0.001). The suppression of glucagon concentrations during the hyperinsulinaemic, euglycaemic clamp correlated with insulin sensitivity (r = 0.24, p = 0.027) and with the 2 h glucose value during the OGTT (r = -0.52, p < 0.001). Conclusion/interpretation Impaired glucose tolerance is associated with reduced insulin-induced suppression of glucagon secretion, which could be caused by A-cell insulin resistance. Inappropriately high glucagon secretion could therefore contribute to the metabolic perturbations in IGT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s001250100003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 95

Authors
Ahr�n, B., & Larsson, H.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
44
Issue
11
Pages
1998-2003
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2056907495
Cited by
95
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Lunds Universitet
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Malmö Högskola
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
  • Medical Research Council
  • Medicinska Fakulteten, Lunds Universitet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
impaired glucose tolerance, glucagon secretion, insulin sensitivity, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, oral glucose tolerance test, non-diabetic women, prediabetes
MeSH terms
Cholesterol, Female, Glucagon, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Sweden, Triglycerides, Glucose Clamp Technique, Body Mass Index, Postmenopause, Glucose Intolerance, Area Under Curve, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review