The relation of glycaemia to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the diabetic control and complications trial
Open accessAbstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We have assessed the relation between the quarterly capillary glucose profile and the risk of the development and progression of retinopathy in the DCCT. METHODS: Seven point (preprandial and 90-min postprandial for each meal and bedtime) capillary glucose data were analysed from volunteers whose collections were complete in 80 %, or more, of quarterly periods and who were in the study longer than 4 years (n = 296, conventional therapy; n = 269, intensive therapy). The study cohort differed from excluded patients in having more women and lower HbA(1c) at baseline and fewer adolescents, older age and lower baseline mean blood glucose in the intensive therapy group. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed significant (p < 0.01) associations to sustained 3-step change in retinopathy of each updated glycaemic parameter: mean blood glucose, mean preprandial glucose, mean postprandial glucose, each preprandial, postprandial and bedtime glucose; range glucose, standard deviation glucose; M-value of Schlichtkrull and mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions, albeit with relatively small hazard ratios. Multivariate analyses showed updated mean blood glucose to be the primary risk factor (p < 0.001) with a weak contribution of mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions at baseline (p < 0.005); no other variables added significantly to the model. The association between updated mean blood glucose and risk for retinopathy was nonlinear: risk progressively increased above updated mean blood glucose of 8.3 mmol/l. A gradient of risk could not be determined below this level because events were few. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: Within the limitations provided by quarterly 7-point capillary glucose measurements as an expression of overall glycaemic behaviour, the major risk for progression of retinopathy is conveyed by updated mean blood glucose especially above 8.3 mmol/l.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) are directly correlated to the risk of complications, with some evidence that PPG might be a stronger independent risk factor for CV complications.
“Similarly, both fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) are directly correlated to the risk of complications, with some evidence that PPG might constitute a stronger independent risk factor for CV complications (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10).”
From Targets for Glycemic Control (2018) · cites this paper as [4]
The Results and Discussion report that preprandial, before-breakfast, and postprandial glucose measures were associated with risk of retinopathy progression. They do not assess cardiovascular complications or show that postprandial glucose is a stronger independent risk factor; the Discussion instead identifies mean blood glucose as the primary determinant of retinopathy risk. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 7 · Cited by 106
- Authors
- Service, F. J., & O'Brien, P. C.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Venue
- Diabetologia
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1215-1220
- ISSN
- 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0428
- OpenAlex
- W1993018456
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Diabetologia (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Advanced Glycation End Products research
- Keywords
- diabetic retinopathy, glycemic control, mean blood glucose, glycaemic excursions, retinopathy progression, risk factors, intensive treatment, conventional therapy, HbA1c
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Blood Glucose, Capillaries, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetic Retinopathy, Fasting, Female, Food, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Risk Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review