CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 221Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthMedical Research and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What’s in a name? Is accurate recognition and labelling of mental disorders by young people associated with better help-seeking and treatment preferences?

Open access
Wright, Annemarie, Jorm, Anthony F., Harris, Meredith G., McGorry, Patrick D.·2007·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
DOI 10.1007/s00127-006-0156-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background The possible benefits or harms of using psychiatric labels in the community have been a focus of debate for many decades. The aim of this study was to examine associations between the accuracy of labelling of depression or psychosis by young people aged 12-25 and their help-seeking, treatment and self-help preferences, whilst controlling for a range of potential confounding factors.Methods A randomly selected population sample of 1,207 young people aged 12-25 years from several regions of Victoria, Australia, was interviewed via a telephone survey. The structured interviews used vignettes of a young person with either depression or psychosis followed by a series of questions related to recognition of disorder and recommended forms of help and treatment. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to measure the association between a range of help-seeking, treatment and self-help preferences and the predictor variables of accuracy of recognition, socio-demographic background and exposure to mental health problems.Results Correct labelling of the disorder was the predictor variable most frequently associated with choice of appropriate help and treatment for both the depression and psychosis vignettes. In regard to self-help preferences, correct labelling of the depression vignette was only associated with being less likely to recommend smoking marijuana to relax. Correct labelling of the psychosis vignette, or labelling it as depression, was associated with being less likely to recommend dealing with the problem alone.Conclusion These findings support the view that improving the use of psychiatric labels by young people is beneficial, because it facilitates appropriate help-seeking and treatment choice. The label may be the cue to activating a schema about appropriate action to take.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-006-0156-x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: fourth edition (DSM-IV). American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (1997) Australian Standard Classification of Occupations, 2nd edn. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra
  3. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
  4. Goldberg D, Huxley P (1980) Mental illness in the community: the pathway to psychiatric care. Tavistock Publications, London
  5. World Health Organization (1993) The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: diagnostic criteria for research. WHO, Geneva

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–221 of 221

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wright, A., Jorm, A. F., Harris, M. G., & McGorry, P. D.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Jorm, Anthony F.
ORCID
Harris, Meredith G.
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2007-02-13
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
244-250
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
DOI
10.1007/s00127-006-0156-x
OpenAlex
W17450404
Cited by
221
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 22
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • 経済論叢
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Terminology › Medical Research and Practices
Keywords
mental disorder recognition, help-seeking, treatment preferences, depression, psychosis, youth, mental health literacy, schema theory, cannabis use, vignettes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Child, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Help Groups, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review