The mental health of young children with intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning
Abstract
Objective To determine within a nationally representative sample of young Australian children: (1) the association amongst intellectual disability, borderline intellectual functioning and the prevalence of possible mental health problems; (2) the association amongst intellectual disability, borderline intellectual functioning and exposure to social disadvantage; (3) the extent to which any between-group differences in the relative risk of possible mental health problems may be attributable to differences in exposure to disadvantageous social circumstances.Methods The study included a secondary analysis of a population-based child cohort of 4,337 children, aged 4/5 years, followed up at age 6/7 years. The main outcome measure was the scoring within the 'abnormal' range at age 6/7 years on the parent-completed Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.Results When compared to typically developing children, children identified at age 4/5 years as having intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning: (1) showed significantly higher rates of possible mental health problems for total difficulties and on all five SDQ subscales at age 6/7 years (OR 1.98-5.58); (2) were significantly more likely to be exposed to socio-economic disadvantage at age 4/5 and 6/7 years. Controlling for the possible confounding effects of exposure to socio-economic disadvantage (and child gender) significantly reduced, but did not eliminate, between-group differences in prevalence.Conclusions Children with limited intellectual functioning make a disproportionate contribution to overall child psychiatric morbidity. Public health and child and adolescent mental health services need to ensure that services and interventions fit to the purpose and are effective for children with limited intellectual functioning, and especially those living in poverty, as they are for other children.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Challenging behaviour poses a significant obstacle to independence, learning, community integration, socialization, and public perception for individuals with mental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder or intellectual and developmental disabilities, thus placing a substantial strain on the individuals themselves and on their caregivers.
“CB poses a significant obstacle to independence, learning, community integration, socialization, and public perception for individuals with mental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), thus placing a substantial strain on the individuals themselves and on their caregivers (5, 6).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 205
- Authors
- Emerson, E., Einfeld, S., & Stancliffe, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Lancaster University (GB)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Emerson, Eric
- Venue
- Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
- Published
- 2009-07-19
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 579-587
- ISSN
- 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-9285
- OpenAlex
- W1993423743
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 7.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
- Keywords
- intellectual disability, borderline intellectual functioning, child mental health, socioeconomic deprivation, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, young children, poverty, child mental health services
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Australia, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Parents, Poverty, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Socioeconomic Factors, Wechsler Scales, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Propensity Score
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review