A national case-control study of risk factors among prisoners in England and Wales
Abstract
Purpose To examine risk factors for suicide among prisoners in a national population.Methods The Ministry of Justice identified all suicides occurring in prisons in England and Wales between 2005 and 2008. Two hundred and twenty suicides were matched to 220 living controls on age, gender, date of reception into prison and establishment type. Relative risks for clinical, custodial, service-response and socio-demographic characteristics were estimated using conditional logistic regression models.Results Having a history of violence and several indicators of past or current psychiatric illness were strong predictors at univariate level. Prisoners who died by suicide were over nine times more likely than controls to have been identified and managed as being at-risk of self-harm/suicide during the prison term. Multivariate analysis identified five mutually independent predictors: previous psychiatric service contact, history of self-harm, single cell occupation, remand status, and non-white ethnicity.Conclusions Suicide risk is elevated among certain types of prisoners, and targeted suicide prevention strategies should be developed for the monitoring, care and support of the high-risk groups that we identified. Further research is needed to determine the causal mechanisms that explain why some prisoners have a higher suicide risk than their peers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prisoners who self-harm are at a six to eight times increased risk of suicide while incarcerated.
“Prisoners who self-harm are at a six to eight times increased risk of suicide while incarcerated9, 10”
From Risk factors for self-harm in prison: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [9]
Half of people who die by suicide in prison have a recorded history of self-harm.
“Half of people who die by suicide in prison have a recorded history of self-harm,9, 10”
From Risk factors for self-harm in prison: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 75
- Authors
- Humber, N., Webb, R., Piper, M., Appleby, L., & Shaw, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Humber, Naomi
- Venue
- Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
- Published
- 2012-12-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1177-1185
- ISSN
- 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-9285
- OpenAlex
- W1976908632
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Keywords
- prison suicide, suicide risk factors, prison population, self-harm, history of violence, suicide prevention, remand prisoners, ethnicity
- MeSH terms
- Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prisoners, Risk, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Suicide, Violence, Wales, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review