Cited by 75Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

A national case-control study of risk factors among prisoners in England and Wales

Humber, Naomi, Webb, Roger, Piper, Mary, Appleby, Louis, Shaw, Jenny·2013·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Purpose To examine risk factors for suicide among prisoners in a national population.Methods The Ministry of Justice identified all suicides occurring in prisons in England and Wales between 2005 and 2008. Two hundred and twenty suicides were matched to 220 living controls on age, gender, date of reception into prison and establishment type. Relative risks for clinical, custodial, service-response and socio-demographic characteristics were estimated using conditional logistic regression models.Results Having a history of violence and several indicators of past or current psychiatric illness were strong predictors at univariate level. Prisoners who died by suicide were over nine times more likely than controls to have been identified and managed as being at-risk of self-harm/suicide during the prison term. Multivariate analysis identified five mutually independent predictors: previous psychiatric service contact, history of self-harm, single cell occupation, remand status, and non-white ethnicity.Conclusions Suicide risk is elevated among certain types of prisoners, and targeted suicide prevention strategies should be developed for the monitoring, care and support of the high-risk groups that we identified. Further research is needed to determine the causal mechanisms that explain why some prisoners have a higher suicide risk than their peers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-012-0632-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 75

Authors
Humber, N., Webb, R., Piper, M., Appleby, L., & Shaw, J.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Humber, Naomi
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2012-12-12
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
1177-1185
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W1976908632
Cited by
75
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
prison suicide, suicide risk factors, prison population, self-harm, history of violence, suicide prevention, remand prisoners, ethnicity
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prisoners, Risk, Risk Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Suicide, Violence, Wales, Case-Control Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review