Cited by 88Mental Health Treatment and AccessBehavioral Health and InterventionsSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

The application of the theory of planned behavior to help-seeking intention in a Chinese society

Mak, Hio Wa, Davis, J. Mark·2014·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Purpose This study tested the efficacy of Ajzen's theory of planned behavior (TPB) in explaining intention to seek mental health services and compared the traditional TPB model with a TPB partial mediation model. It also aimed to understand factors related to intention to seek mental health services in Macao to inform local policies. Method The present study consisted of two phases: (a) a pilot study to develop belief-based measures used in the main study, and (b) a cross-sectional study to investigate the application of TPB in understanding help-seeking intention. In the main study, 337 Macao residents (age range 18-65) participated in a survey conducted in the community. Results The TPB partial mediation model was better than the traditional TPB model in explaining help-seeking intention in Macao. The model also suggested that attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control were all significant predictors of help-seeking intention. However, symptom severity, prior help-seeking, and gender did not significantly directly predict help-seeking intention. Conclusion Preference for the TPB partial mediation model may be culturally relevant. The implications of the findings are discussed in relation to the salient beliefs about help-seeking. Limitations and recommendations for future research are provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-013-0792-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 88

Authors
Mak, H. W., & Davis, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Macau (MO)
  • Charles Darwin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Mak, Hio Wa
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2013-11-14
Volume
49
Issue
9
Pages
1501-1515
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W2072415410
Cited by
88
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
theory of planned behavior, help-seeking intentions, mental health service utilization, attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, cultural relevance, Macau, Chinese society, mental health policy
MeSH terms
Adult, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Pilot Projects, Psychological Theory, Intention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review