Cited by 26Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Treatment and AccessMental Health and Psychiatry

Insight and attitudes towards medication among inpatients with chronic schizophrenia in the US and China

Mohamed, Somaia, Rosenheck, Robert, He, Hongbo, Yuping, Ning·2014·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Background The impact of culture on insight on illness and attitudes towards medication among patients with schizophrenia has not been well studied. We compared inpatients in the US and in China (a culture that numerous studies have shown heavily stigmatizes mental illness and psychosis), on measures of insight and acceptance of medication, controlling for overall severity of schizophrenia symptoms.Methods Clinical antipsychotic treatment for intervention effectiveness (CATIE) was a large study of pharmacotherapy of people with schizophrenia across the US. Insight was measured using the insight and treatment attitudes questionnaire (ITAQ) and attitudes towards medication by the drug attitude inventory (DAI) and symptoms of schizophrenia by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). These measures were applied to a sample of hospitalized patients diagnosed with schizophrenia at the Guangzhou Psychiatric hospital, the largest psychiatric hospital in Southern China. Mean ITAQ and DAI scores, net of total schizophrenia symptoms and other differences were compared at the time of admission using analysis of covariance.Results Both insight and favourable attitudes towards medication were significantly and substantially lower in the sample from Guangzhou on bivariate analysis even after adjusting for severity of overall schizophrenia symptoms on the PANSS.Conclusion Inpatients in China had far lower scores on measures of insight and acceptance of their need for and benefits of medication, controlling for overall severity of schizophrenia symptoms, suggesting a significant impact of Chinese culture which is presumed to more heavily stigmatize mental illness and especially psychosis, although other explanations can not be ruled out.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-014-0824-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 26

Authors
Mohamed, S., Rosenheck, R., He, H., & Yuping, N.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Guangzhou Psychiatric Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Mohamed, Somaia
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2014-02-19
Volume
49
Issue
7
Pages
1063-1070
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W2044979734
Cited by
26
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
schizophrenia, insight into illness, attitudes toward medication, drug acceptance, cultural factors, mental health stigma, hospitalized patients, cross-cultural comparison, China, United States, CATIE
MeSH terms
China, Chronic Disease, Female, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Inpatients, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Antipsychotic Agents, United States, Treatment Outcome, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review