Cited by 38Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Perceptions of public attitudes towards persons with mental illness in Beijing, China: results from a representative survey

Liu, J., Yan, F., Ma, X., Guo, H. L., Tang, Y. L., Rakofsky, J. J., Wu, X. M., Li, X. Q. +9 more·2016·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Objectives Many studies have examined the general public's attitudes towards people with mental illness, but such studies are scarce in China. This study examined the perceptions of the Beijing population regarding their society's prevalent attitudes towards people with mental illness.Methods A total of 5000 individuals aged 18 or above living in Beijing were selected using a multistage, stratified, cluster and random sampling method. This was followed by a face-to-face interview which used a standardized questionnaire asking about societal attitudes towards individuals with mental illness.Results 4602 out of 5000 eligible individuals met the inclusion criteria and participated in the interview. 4596 questionnaires were deemed valid and included in the analyses. A large proportion of respondents believed that most individuals within their society held negative attitudes and had a strong desire to distance themselves from people with mental illness. Respondents aged 60 or older, who lived farther to downtown Beijing, or with higher education tended to believe that most individuals have relatively positive and tolerant attitudes towards people with mental illness.Conclusions Many people in Beijing perceive that most members of their society have negative beliefs towards people with mental illness. Further efforts are needed to determine if these perceptions are accurate and to reduce the stigma that is reinforced by these perceptions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-015-1125-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 38

Authors
Liu, J., Yan, F., Ma, X., Guo, H. L., Tang, Y. L., Rakofsky, J. J., Wu, X. M., Li, X. Q., Zhu, H., Guo, X. B., Yang, Y., Li, P., Cao, X. D., Li, H. Y., Li, Z. B., Wang, P., & Xu, Q. Y.
Affiliations
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
  • Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Ma, X.
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2015-10-28
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
443-453
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W1863069122
Cited by
38
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Science and Technology Development Fund
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
attitudes toward mental illness, stigma, public perception, social distance, mental health stigma, Beijing, age differences, educational differences, urban-rural differences
MeSH terms
Beijing, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Public Opinion, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review