Cited by 26Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Mortality among involuntarily admitted psychiatric patients: a survival analysis

Crisanti, A. S., Love, E. J.·1999·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Background Only a few studies have examined mortality among committed psychiatric patients, and most of them suffer methodologically from selected populations, small samples, and inappropriate methods of data analysis. The purpose of this study was to determine whether involuntarily admitted psychiatric inpatients are a high risk group for mortality compared to a group of voluntarily admitted psychiatric inpatients.Method A retrospective cohort design was used with a maximum 9-year variable follow-up. A multistage sampling procedure was used to generate the sample, which consisted of 1064 involuntarily admitted patients and 1078 voluntarily admitted patients.Results During the follow-up period, 107 deaths were identified, 58 involuntary and 49 voluntary [chi 2 (1) = 0.9255, P = 0.336]. No significant differences were observed between the cohorts when survival analysis was used to examine survival experiences in the community.Conclusions Compared to voluntary patients, involuntary patients do not appear to be at a higher risk for mortality. The high standard mortality ratios observed in both cohorts, however, are consistent with previous findings of high mortality among psychiatric patients in general, and support the need for intensive follow-up in the community following discharge from a psychiatric inpatient unit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s001270050185

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Five studies found an increased risk of suicide for people admitted involuntarily.

    “However, five studies found an increased risk of suicide for people admitted involuntarily (98–102), and one study found that involuntary admission was associated with a greater risk of all-cause mortality (with no deaths attributable to suicide in either group) (103).”
  • Five studies found no difference in the risk of suicide or all-cause mortality among involuntarily and voluntarily admitted patients.

    “Five studies found no difference in the risk of suicide or all-cause mortality among involuntarily and voluntarily admitted patients (71,96,97,100).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 26

Authors
Crisanti, A. S., & Love, E. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
1999-12-31
Volume
34
Issue
12
Pages
627-633
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W1989732794
Cited by
26
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
involuntary admission, psychiatric inpatients, mortality, voluntary admission, psychiatric patients, community follow-up, standardized mortality ratio, survival analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Canada, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Commitment of Mentally Ill, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Patient Admission, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review