Cited by 189Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and AccessAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Questionnaire screening for mental health problems in Bangladeshi children: a preliminary study

Mullick, M. S. I., Goodman, R.·2001·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Background In the developing world, child psychiatric disorders are common but child mental health professionals are scarce. A cheap and effective method for detecting child psychiatric problems would be useful. The present study examined the potential suitability of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for this role. Methods SDQs were administered to the parents and teachers of 261 Bangladeshi 4-16 year olds: 99 drawn from a psychiatric clinic and 162 drawn from the community. Self-report SDQs were completed by 11-16 year olds. Children from the clinic sample were assigned psychiatric diagnoses blind to their SDQ scores. Results SDQ scores distinguished well between community and clinic samples, and also between children with different psychiatric diagnoses in the clinic sample. A simple algorithm based on SDQ scores was used to predict whether children had hyperkinesis, conduct disorders, emotional disorders or any psychiatric disorder--rates of predicted disorder varied markedly between clinic and community samples. Conclusions Predictions based on multi-informant SDQs potentially provide a cheap and easy method for detecting children in the developing world with significant mental health problems. The potential effectiveness of any such screening programme should be evaluated on a broad range of children, using both international and culture-specific assessments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s001270050295

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 189

Authors
Mullick, M. S. I., & Goodman, R.
Affiliations
  • Bangladesh Medical University (BD)
  • King's College London (GB)
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2001-04-03
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
94-99
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W2034125336
Cited by
189
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, child mental health screening, child psychopathology, Bangladeshi children, multi-informant assessment, parent and teacher ratings, hyperkinesia, conduct disorder, emotional disorders, resource-limited settings
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Bangladesh, Mental Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Mass Screening, Psychological Tests, Reference Values, ROC Curve, Age of Onset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review