Questionnaire screening for mental health problems in Bangladeshi children: a preliminary study
Abstract
Background In the developing world, child psychiatric disorders are common but child mental health professionals are scarce. A cheap and effective method for detecting child psychiatric problems would be useful. The present study examined the potential suitability of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for this role. Methods SDQs were administered to the parents and teachers of 261 Bangladeshi 4-16 year olds: 99 drawn from a psychiatric clinic and 162 drawn from the community. Self-report SDQs were completed by 11-16 year olds. Children from the clinic sample were assigned psychiatric diagnoses blind to their SDQ scores. Results SDQ scores distinguished well between community and clinic samples, and also between children with different psychiatric diagnoses in the clinic sample. A simple algorithm based on SDQ scores was used to predict whether children had hyperkinesis, conduct disorders, emotional disorders or any psychiatric disorder--rates of predicted disorder varied markedly between clinic and community samples. Conclusions Predictions based on multi-informant SDQs potentially provide a cheap and easy method for detecting children in the developing world with significant mental health problems. The potential effectiveness of any such screening programme should be evaluated on a broad range of children, using both international and culture-specific assessments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire has been used in clinical practice.
“The SDQ has also been used in clinical practice (Mullick and Goodman, 2001).”
From Longitudinal associations between reading for pleasure and child maladjustment: Results from a propensity score matching analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Mullick and Goodman, 2001
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 189
- Authors
- Mullick, M. S. I., & Goodman, R.
- Affiliations
- Bangladesh Medical University (BD)
- King's College London (GB)
- Venue
- Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
- Published
- 2001-04-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 94-99
- ISSN
- 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-9285
- OpenAlex
- W2034125336
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Keywords
- Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, child mental health screening, child psychopathology, Bangladeshi children, multi-informant assessment, parent and teacher ratings, hyperkinesia, conduct disorder, emotional disorders, resource-limited settings
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Bangladesh, Mental Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Mass Screening, Psychological Tests, Reference Values, ROC Curve, Age of Onset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review