Cited by 442Respiratory Support and MechanismsIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units

Recovery and outcomes after the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients and their family caregivers

Herridge, Margaret S., Moss, Marc, Hough, Catherine L., Hopkins, Ramona O., Rice, Todd W., Bienvenu, O. Joseph, Azoulay, Elie·2016·Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract

Outcomes after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are similar to those of other survivors of critical illness and largely affect the nerve, muscle, and central nervous system but also include a constellation of varied physical devastations ranging from contractures and frozen joints to tooth loss and cosmesis. Compromised quality of life is related to a spectrum of impairment of physical, social, emotional, and neurocognitive function and to a much lesser extent discrete pulmonary disability. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICUAW) is ubiquitous and includes contributions from both critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy, and recovery from these lesions may be incomplete at 5 years after ICU discharge. Cognitive impairment in ARDS survivors ranges from 70 to 100 % at hospital discharge, 46 to 80 % at 1 year, and 20 % at 5 years, and mood disorders including depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are also sustained and prevalent. Robust multidisciplinary and longitudinal interventions that improve these outcomes are still uncertain and data in our literature are conflicting. Studies are needed in family members of ARDS survivors to better understand long-term outcomes of the post-ICU family syndrome and to evaluate how it affects patient recovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00134-016-4321-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 149 · Cited by 442

Authors
Herridge, M. S., Moss, M., Hough, C. L., Hopkins, R. O., Rice, T. W., Bienvenu, O. J., & Azoulay, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Brigham Young University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Herridge, Margaret S.
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2016-03-30
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
725-738
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
OpenAlex
W2322956032
Cited by
442
References
149
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 5
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Intensive Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Keywords
acute respiratory distress syndrome, long-term outcomes, family caregivers, ICU-acquired weakness, critical illness polyneuropathy, critical illness myopathy, cognitive impairment, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, quality of life, post-intensive care syndrome, multidisciplinary intervention
MeSH terms
Cognition Disorders, Disability Evaluation, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Polyneuropathies, Quality of Life, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Respiratory Function Tests, Risk Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Caregivers, Survivors, Muscle Weakness, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review