Cited by 70Hospital Admissions and OutcomesFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsPatient Safety and Medication Errors

A multi-center prospective cohort study of patient transfers from the intensive care unit to the hospital ward

Stelfox, Henry T., Leigh, Jeanna Parsons, Dodek, Peter M., Turgeon, Alexis F., Forster, Alan J., Lamontagne, Francois, Fowler, Rob A., Soo, Andrea +1 more·2017·Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract

Purpose To provide a 360-degree description of ICU-to-ward transfers.Methods Prospective cohort study of 451 adults transferred from a medical-surgical ICU to a hospital ward in 10 Canadian hospitals July 2014-January 2016. Transfer processes documented in the medical record. Patient (or delegate) and provider (ICU/ward physician/nurse) perspectives solicited by survey 24-72 h after transfer.Results Medical records (100%) and survey responses (ICU physicians-80%, ICU nurses-80%, ward physicians-46%, ward nurses-64%, patients-74%) were available for most transfers. The median time from initiation to completion of transfer was 25 h (IQR 6-52). ICU physicians and nurses reported communicating with counterparts via telephone (78 and 75%) when transfer was requested (82 and 24%) or accepted (31 and 59%) and providing more elements of clinical information than ward physicians (mean 4.7 vs. 3.9, p < 0.001) and nurses (5.0 vs. 4.4, p < 0.001) reported receiving. Patients were more likely to report satisfaction with the transfer when they received more information (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.18-1.48), had their questions addressed (OR 3.96, 95% CI 1.33-11.84), met the ward physician prior to transfer (OR 4.61, 95% CI 2.90-7.33), and were assessed by a nurse within 1 h of ward arrival (OR 4.70, 95% CI 2.29-9.66). Recommendations for improvement included having a documented care plan travel with the patient (all stakeholders), standardized face-to-face handover (physicians), avoiding transfers at shift change (nurses) and informing patients about pending transfers in advance (patients).Conclusions ICU-to-ward transfers are characterized by failures of patient flow and communication; experienced differently by patients, ICU/ward physicians and nurses, with distinct suggestions for improvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00134-017-4910-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 70

Authors
Stelfox, H. T., Leigh, J. P., Dodek, P. M., Turgeon, A. F., Forster, A. J., Lamontagne, F., Fowler, R. A., Soo, A., & Bagshaw, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Alberta Health Services (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Stelfox, Henry T.
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2017-08-29
Volume
43
Issue
10
Pages
1485-1494
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
OpenAlex
W2753170989
Cited by
70
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Intensive Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Frailty Network (CORE 2013-12A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
ICU-to-ward transfer, patient handover, patient flow, interprofessional communication, patient satisfaction, clinical documentation, shift change, nurse handover
MeSH terms
Canada, Continuity of Patient Care, Female, Hospital Units, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Interprofessional Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Transfer, Professional-Patient Relations, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review