The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: author's reply
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The SMART trial was a single-center study without individual patient randomization and no blinded assignment of the intervention, it exposed participants to moderate amount of fluid volume, identification of sepsis subgroups was based on ICD-10 codes, and it used a composite outcome which may not be as relevant as a patient-centered outcome (336).”
From Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021. (2021) · cites this paper as [336]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“A systematic review and meta-analysis of nine RCTs [2] showed that HFNC reduces intubation compared with conventional oxygen (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.74–0.99) but does not affect the risk of death or ICU length of stay [412–414].”
From Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [414]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rochwerg, B. N., Granton, D., Wang, D. X., Helviz, Y., Einav, S., Frat, J. P., Dessap, A. M., Schreiber, A. F., Azoulay, É., Mercat, A., et al. (2019) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-019-05590-5 · Cited by 417
Self-citationLuo, M., Huang, G., & Wu, L. (2019) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-019-05652-8 · Cited by 3
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021
Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C. M., French, C., Machado, F. R., Mcintyre, L., Ostermann, M., Prescott, H. C., et al. (2021) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y · Cited by 5,082
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.
Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C. M., French, C., Machado, F. R., Mcintyre, L., Ostermann, M., Prescott, H. C., et al. (2021) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000005337 · Cited by 2,935
Global burden of liver disease: 2023 update
Devarbhavi, H., Asrani, S. K., Arab, J. P., Nartey, Y. A., Pose, E., & Kamath, P. S. (2023) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2023.03.017 · Cited by 2,267
Alhazzani, W., Møller, M. H., Arabi, Y. M., Loeb, M., Gong, M. N., Fan, E., Oczkowski, S., Levy, M. M., Derde, L., Dzierba, A., et al. (2020) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-020-06022-5 · Cited by 2,105
Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations
Phua, J., Weng, L., Ling, L., Egi, M., Lim, C.-M., Divatia, J. V., Shrestha, B. R., Arabi, Y. M., Ng, J., Gomersall, C. D., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30161-2 · Cited by 1,509
Metadata
- Authors
- Rochwerg, B., Granton, D., Wang, D. X., Einav, S., & Burns, K. E. A.
- Affiliations
- Juravinski Hospital (CA)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Western University (CA)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Rochwerg, Bram
- Venue
- Intensive Care Medicine
- Published
- 2019-06-24
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1171-1171
- ISSN
- 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1238
- OpenAlex
- W2952178284
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 3
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Intensive Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
- Keywords
- high-flow nasal cannula, conventional oxygen therapy, acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation, oxygen delivery
- MeSH terms
- Cannula, Hypoxia, Humans, Oxygen, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy, Respiratory Insufficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
