Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intensive care during the coronavirus epidemic

Open access
China Critical Care Clinical Trials Group (CCCCTG), Qiu, Haibo, Tong, Zhaohui, Ma, Penglin, Hu, Ming, Peng, Zhiyong, Wu, Wenjuan, Du, Bin·2020·Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract

In December 2019, an epidemic caused by novel coronavirus arrived in Wuhan and quickly spread to the whole country even the world, seriously threatening human health and global public health security. How to improve the treatment and reduce the mortality is a great challenge. In this paper, we review and summarize the strategies and research advancement from critical care medicine, so as to provide reference for the treatment of critically ill patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia. Key words: Novel coronavirus pneumonia; Intensive care; Diagnosis and treatment strategy

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00134-020-05966-y

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
China Critical Care Clinical Trials Group (CCCCTG), Qiu, H., Tong, Z., Ma, P., Hu, M., Peng, Z., Wu, W., & Du, B.
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2020-02-20
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
576-578
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
OpenAlex
W3008925440
Cited by
164
References
0
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.