How to cheat on your final paper: Assigning AI for student writing
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To date, scholars have primarily focused on the implications of LLMs on education, with limited attention to their impact on science and scientific practices.
“To date, scholars have primarily focused on the implications of LLMs on education (e.g., Perkins 2023; Fyfe 2023) with limited attention being paid to their impact on science and scientific practices (for exceptions, see Chubb et al. 2022;Ribeiro et al. 2023).”
From Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system (2025) · cites this paper as Fyfe 2023
This adds a new and fresh direction to the LLM discussion, which has focused heavily on the impact of this technology for individual academics and learners.
“This adds a new and fresh direction to the LLM discussion, which has focused heavily on the impact of this technology for individual academics and learners (Fyfe 2023;Perkins 2023).”
From Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system (2025) · cites this paper as Fyfe 2023
Users obtaining LLM outputs might claim them as authors for deceiving readers, cheating during exams, or improving bibliometric indicators.
“The users obtaining such outputs might therefore claim them as the authors, e.g., for deceiving readers (Grinbaum and Adomaitis, 2022), for cheating during exams (Fyfe, 2023), or for improving bibliometric indicators (Crothers et al., 2022).”
From On the creativity of large language models (2025) · cites this paper as Fyfe, 2023
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 205
- Authors
- Fyfe, P.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fyfe, Paul
- ORCID
- Fyfe, Paul
- Venue
- AI & SOCIETY
- Published
- 2022-03-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1395-1405
- ISSN
- 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-5655
- OpenAlex
- W4221015229
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 40.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- AI & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- AI-assisted writing, GPT-2, student writing, academic integrity, plagiarism, AI ethics, authenticity in writing, creativity, writing instruction, language models, undergraduate composition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review