The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blind search and flexible product visions: the sociotechnical shaping of generative music engines
Abstract
Amidst the surge in AI-oriented commercial ventures, music is a site of intensive efforts to innovate. A number of companies are seeking to apply AI to music production and consumption, and amongst them several are seeking to reinvent the music listening experience as adaptive, interactive, functional and infinitely generative. These are bold objectives, having no clear roadmap for what designs, technologies and use cases, if any, will be successful. Thus each company relies on speculative product visions. Through four case studies of such companies, I consider how product visions must carefully provide a clear plan for developers and investors, whilst also remaining open to agile user-centred product development strategies, which I discuss in terms of the ‘blind search’ nature of innovation. I suggest that innovation in this area needs to be understood in terms of technological emergence, which is neither technologically determinist nor driven entirely by the visions of founders, but through a complex of interacting forces. I also consider, through these cases, how, through the accumulation of residual value, all such start-up work risks being exapted for more familiar extractive capitalist agendas under the general process that Doctorow calls “enshittification”. Lastly, I consider a number of other more specific ways in which these projects, if their growth is achieved, could influence music culture more broadly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence
CRAWFORD, K. (2021) · doi:10.2307/j.ctv1ghv45t · Cited by 742
Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned: The Myth of the Objective
Stanley, K. O., & Lehman, J. (2015) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15524-1 · Cited by 139
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Amabile T (1996) Creativity in context, Westview press
- Born G (2022) Cultures in AI/AI in culture: A NeurIPS 2022 Workshop position paper. NeurIPS Workshop on Cultures in AI/AI in Culture
- Born G (2022) Music and digital media: a planetary anthropology, UCL Press. · doi:10.14324/111.9781800082434
- Dean RT (2018) The Oxford handbook of algorithmic music. Oxford University Press, Oxford · DOI
- Drott E (2018) Why the next song matters: streaming, recommendation, scarcity. Twentieth-Century Music 15(3):325–357 · DOI
- Drott E (2021) Copyright, compensation, and commons in the music AI industry. Creat Ind J 14(2):190–207
- Haruvi A, Kopito R, Brande-Eilat N, Kalev S, Kay E, Furman D (2021) Modeling the effect of background sounds on human focus using brain decoding technology. bioRxiv: 2021.2004.2002.438269 · DOI
- Hodgson T (2020) Quantifying music: imagined metrics in digital startup culture. Culture Theory Crit 61(4):424–439 · doi:10.1080/14735784.2021.1894961
- Kurzweil R (1999) The age of spiritual machines: how we will live, work and think in the new age of intelligent machines. Orion
- Perkins DN (1996) Creativity: beyond the Darwinian paradigm. MIT Press, Dimensions of Creativity. M. Boden, pp 119–142
- Prey R (2018) Nothing personal: algorithmic individuation on music streaming platforms. Media Cult Soc 40(7):1086–1100 · DOI
- Simonton DK (2011) Creativity and discovery as blind variation: Campbell’s (1960) BVSR model after the half-century mark. Rev Gen Psychol 15(2):158 · DOI · Paper page
- Sparrow J (2022) Music Ally Focus #51: Edward Balassanian, CEO of Aimi, talks about how AI music will power metaverse experiences, paying AI music collaborators, and how it will change the way we think about music. J Sparrow 1:1
- Stark L (2018) Algorithmic psychometrics and the scalable subject. Soc Stud Sci 48(2):204–231 · DOI
- Sternberg RJ (2006) The nature of creativity. Creat Res J 18(1):87–98 · DOI · Paper page
- Sternberg RJ, Lubart TI (1991) An investment theory of creativity and its development. Hum Dev 34(1):1–31 · DOI · Paper page
- Watson A, Leyshon A (2022) Negotiating platformisation: MusicTech, intellectual property rights and third wave platform reintermediation in the music industry. J Cult Econ 15(3):326–343 · doi:10.1080/17530350.2022.2028653
- Weber RJ, Perkins DN (1992). Inventive minds: creativity in technology. Oxford University Press on Demand · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195071702.001.0001
Metadata
- Authors
- Bown, O.
- Venue
- AI & SOCIETY
- Published
- 2024-03-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 585-603
- ISSN
- 0951-5666
- 1435-5655
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Licence
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (vor)
- Funders
- HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (101019164)
- University of New South Wales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blind search and flexible product visions: the sociotechnical shaping of generative music engines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00146-024-01862-x
- The paper
- Bown, O. (2025). Blind search and flexible product visions: the sociotechnical shaping of generative music engines. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01862-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.