The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Topology optimization approaches: A comparative review
Sigmund, O., & Maute, K. (2013) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6 · Cited by 2,890
Topology Optimization in Aircraft and Aerospace Structures Design
Zhu, J.-H., Zhang, W.-H., & Xia, L. (2016) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-015-9151-2 · Cited by 980
Current and future trends in topology optimization for additive manufacturing
Liu, J., Gaynor, A. T., Chen, S., Kang, Z., Suresh, K., Takezawa, A., Li, L., Kato, J., Tang, J., Wang, C. C. L., et al. (2018) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-018-1994-3 · Cited by 870
A further review of ESO type methods for topology optimization
Huang, X., & Xie, Y.-M. (2010) · Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization · doi:10.1007/s00158-010-0487-9 · Cited by 462
From Topology Optimization Design to Additive Manufacturing: Today’s Success and Tomorrow’s Roadmap
Meng, L., Zhang, W., Quan, D., Shi, G., Tang, L., Hou, Y., Breitkopf, P., Zhu, J., & Gao, T. (2020) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-019-09331-1 · Cited by 402
Metadata
- Authors
- Rozvany, G. I. N.
- Venue
- Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization
- Published
- 2008-02-21
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 217-237
- ISSN
- 1615-147X (ISSN-L)
- 1615-1488
- OpenAlex
- W2024127739
- Cited by
- 1,078
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 109.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00158-007-0217-0
- The paper
- Rozvany, G. I. N. (2009). A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-007-0217-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
