Cited by 130Total Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms

Femoral bone and cartilage wear is predictable at 0° and 90° in the osteoarthritic knee treated with total knee arthroplasty

Nam, Denis, Lin, Kenneth M., Howell, Stephen M., Hull, Maury L.·2014·Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Abstract

Purpose Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) positions the femoral component at the natural angle and level of the distal (0°) and posterior (90°) joint line. This technique applies referencing guides at 0° and 90° that are adjusted to compensate for wear and kerf and perform resections equal in thickness to the femoral component. Knowing whether femoral bone and cartilage wear is predictable would assist in establishing general guidelines for adjusting the resection level of these two referencing guides. This study tests the hypothesis that femoral bone and cartilage wear is predictable at 0° and 90° in the varus and valgus osteoarthritic knee treated with TKA. Methods The study consists of 205 patients and 208 knees with Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 3 or 4 osteoarthritis and treated with a TKA. Each knee had a narrow slice (2 mm) preoperative 1.5 tesla magnetic resonance image in the sagittal plane. Femoral bone and cartilage wear at 0° and 90° was computed from best-fit circles superimposed on the peripheral boundary of the subchondral bone on the medial and lateral femoral condyles. Results Overall, 99.5% of knees had minimal bone wear ( 1 mm cartilage wear on the medial femoral condyle. In the 26% (54 of 208) of knees with a valgus deformity, 78% at 0° and 55% at 90° had ≥1 mm cartilage wear on the lateral femoral condyle. Conclusions As a general guideline, adjustment for femoral bone wear is rarely required when performing kinematically aligned TKA. Most oste…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00167-014-3080-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nam, D., Lin, K. M., Howell, S. M., & Hull, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Barnes-Jewish Hospital (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Nam, Denis
Venue
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-20
Volume
22
Issue
12
Pages
2975-2981
ISSN
  • 0942-2056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7347
OpenAlex
W2120053716
Cited by
130
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8
FWCI
9.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Keywords
total knee arthroplasty, varus deformity, valgus deformity, knee osteoarthritis, femoral condyle, subchondral bone, magnetic resonance imaging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cartilage, Articular, Female, Femur, Humans, Knee Joint, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Knee

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review