Cited by 129Total Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reduces knee adduction moment more than mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty

Niki, Yasuo, Nagura, Takeo, Nagai, Katsuya, Kobayashi, Shu, Harato, Kengo·2018·Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Abstract

Purpose Knee adduction moment (KAM) has been recognized as a good clinical surrogate for medial tibiofemoral joint loading and is associated with implant durability after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to examine the effects of joint line obliquity in kinematically aligned TKA (KA-TKA) on KAM during gait. Methods The study enrolled 21 knees from 18 patients who underwent cylindrical axis reference KA-TKA and a matched group of 21 knees from 18 patients who underwent mechanically aligned (MA)-TKA as controls. Gait analyses were performed the day before TKA and at an overall mean of 2.6 years postoperatively. First peak KAM and variables associated with frontal knee kinetics were determined and compared between groups. Results In KA-TKA, the proximal tibia was resected with 3.4° ± 1.5° of varus in relation to the mechanical axis, and the final femorotibial shaft axis was 176.7° ± 3.8° with KA-TKA and 174.4° ± 3.0° with MA-TKA. KAM was significantly smaller with KA-TKA than with MA-TKA (p Conclusions In KA-TKA, joint line obliquity reduced peak KAM during gait, despite slight varus limb alignment, and this reduced KAM in KA-TKA can tolerate constitutional varus alignment. In clinical settings, KA-TKA thus represents a promising technical option for patients with large coronal bowing of the shaft carrying a risk of increased KAM after TKA. Level of evidence III.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00167-017-4788-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Niki, Y., Nagura, T., Nagai, K., Kobayashi, S., & Harato, K.
Affiliations
Keio University (JP)
Corresponding author
Nagura, Takeo
Venue
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-12-04
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
1629-1635
ISSN
  • 0942-2056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7347
OpenAlex
W2773578443
Cited by
129
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7
FWCI
10.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
total knee arthroplasty, knee adduction moment, joint line obliquity, knee adduction angle, lever arm, tibiofemoral joint loading, gait kinematics
MeSH terms
Aged, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Gait, Humans, Knee Joint, Knee Prosthesis, Male, Range of Motion, Articular, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Genu Varum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review