Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reduces knee adduction moment more than mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty
Abstract
Purpose Knee adduction moment (KAM) has been recognized as a good clinical surrogate for medial tibiofemoral joint loading and is associated with implant durability after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study aimed to examine the effects of joint line obliquity in kinematically aligned TKA (KA-TKA) on KAM during gait. Methods The study enrolled 21 knees from 18 patients who underwent cylindrical axis reference KA-TKA and a matched group of 21 knees from 18 patients who underwent mechanically aligned (MA)-TKA as controls. Gait analyses were performed the day before TKA and at an overall mean of 2.6 years postoperatively. First peak KAM and variables associated with frontal knee kinetics were determined and compared between groups. Results In KA-TKA, the proximal tibia was resected with 3.4° ± 1.5° of varus in relation to the mechanical axis, and the final femorotibial shaft axis was 176.7° ± 3.8° with KA-TKA and 174.4° ± 3.0° with MA-TKA. KAM was significantly smaller with KA-TKA than with MA-TKA (p Conclusions In KA-TKA, joint line obliquity reduced peak KAM during gait, despite slight varus limb alignment, and this reduced KAM in KA-TKA can tolerate constitutional varus alignment. In clinical settings, KA-TKA thus represents a promising technical option for patients with large coronal bowing of the shaft carrying a risk of increased KAM after TKA. Level of evidence III.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Personalized alignment strategies that target recreation of native knee joint morphology may limit the need for soft tissue releases and result in more natural kinematics.
“Personalized alignment strategies that target recreation of native knee joint morphology may limit the need for soft tissue releases and result in more natural kinematics [8, 9, 34, 35].”
From Imageless robotic total knee arthroplasty determines similar coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) parameters to long leg radiographs (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Edelstein, A. I., Orsi, A. D., Plaskos, C., Coffey, S., & Suleiman, L. I. (2024) · Arthroplasty · doi:10.1186/s42836-024-00231-9 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Personalized alignment strategies that target recreation of native knee joint morphology may limit the need for soft tissue releases and result in more natural kinematics [8, 9, 34, 35].”
Background
- Authors
- Niki, Y., Nagura, T., Nagai, K., Kobayashi, S., & Harato, K.
- Affiliations
- Keio University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Nagura, Takeo
- Venue
- Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-12-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1629-1635
- ISSN
- 0942-2056 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7347
- OpenAlex
- W2773578443
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Keywords
- total knee arthroplasty, knee adduction moment, joint line obliquity, knee adduction angle, lever arm, tibiofemoral joint loading, gait kinematics
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Gait, Humans, Knee Joint, Knee Prosthesis, Male, Range of Motion, Articular, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Genu Varum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review