Cited by 198Total Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty better reproduces normal gait than mechanical alignment

Blakeney, William, Clément, Julien, Desmeules, François, Hagemeister, Nicola, Rivière, Charles, Vendittoli, Pascal‐André·2019·Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Abstract

Purpose Kinematic alignment technique for TKA aims to restore the individual knee anatomy and ligament tension, to restore native knee kinematics. The aim of this study was to compare parameters of kinematics during gait (knee flexion-extension, adduction-abduction, internal-external tibial rotation and walking speed) of TKA patients operated by either kinematic alignment or mechanical alignment technique with a group of healthy controls. The hypothesis was that the kinematic parameters of kinematically aligned TKAs would more closely resemble that of healthy controls than mechanically aligned TKAs. Methods This was a retrospective case-control study. Eighteen kinematically aligned TKAs were matched by gender, age, operating surgeon and prosthesis to 18 mechanically aligned TKAs. Post-operative 3D knee kinematics analysis, performed with an optoelectronic knee assessment device (KneeKG®), was compared between mechanical alignment TKA patients, kinematic alignment TKA patients and healthy controls. Radiographic measures and clinical scores were also compared between the two TKA groups. Results The kinematic alignment group showed no significant knee kinematic differences compared to healthy knees in sagittal plane range of motion, maximum flexion, abduction-adduction curves or knee external tibial rotation. Conversely, the mechanical alignment group displayed several significant knee kinematic differences to the healthy group: less sagittal plane range of motion (49.1° vs. 54.…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00167-018-5174-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blakeney, W., Clément, J., Desmeules, F., Hagemeister, N., Rivière, C., & Vendittoli, P.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (CA)
  • Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Vendittoli, Pascal‐André
Venue
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
1410-1417
ISSN
  • 0942-2056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7347
OpenAlex
W2895693203
Cited by
198
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 8
FWCI
13.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Espace ÉTS (ETS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
total knee arthroplasty, kinematic alignment, mechanical alignment, knee kinematics, gait, tibial external rotation, knee flexion range of motion, ligament tension, KOOS score, patient satisfaction, walking speed
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Biomechanical Phenomena, Computer Simulation, Female, Gait, Humans, Knee Joint, Knee Prosthesis, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Period, Prosthesis Design, Retrospective Studies, Case-Control Studies, Range of Motion, Articular, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review