Cited by 52Total Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms

Functional knee phenotypes of OA patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty are significantly more varus or valgus than in a non‐OA control group

Jenny, Jean‐Yves, Baldairon, Florent, Hirschmann, Michael T.·2022·Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to analyse the coronal alignment of a large population of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty using a modern classification of the knee phenotypes found in a population of non-osteoarthritic individuals. Methods Five hundred and four navigated total knee arthroplasties were included in the OA group. The following angles were measured with a computer image-free navigation system: mechanical femorotibial angle measured on the medial side without stress and with maximum manual stress to reduce deformation, and medial distal femoral mechanical angle. The native medial distal femoral and medial proximal tibial angles (coronal orientation of the femoral or tibial joint line after correction of wear) were calculated. The data were analysed as categorical data. These data were then compared with those published in a non-arthritic population, considered as a control non-OA group. The main criterion was the percentage of subjects with normal overall coronal alignment, defined by the association of a normal native medial distal femoral angle and a normal native medial proximal tibial angle. The secondary criteria were the percentages of subjects with normal medial femorotibial mechanical angle, normal native medial distal femoral angle and normal native medial proximal tibial angle. The influence of gender on primary and secondary criteria in the study group was analysed. The most frequent phenotypes in the study group were identified. Results N…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00167-021-06687-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jenny, J., Baldairon, F., & Hirschmann, M. T.
Affiliations
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR)
  • University of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Jenny, Jean‐Yves
Venue
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-08-11
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
2609-2616
ISSN
  • 0942-2056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7347
OpenAlex
W3188519661
Cited by
52
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Keywords
knee osteoarthritis, total knee arthroplasty, coronal alignment, genu varum, genu valgum, femorotibial angle, distal femoral angle, proximal tibial angle, computer-assisted navigation, gender differences, reference population comparison, mechanical axis deviation, posterior tibial slope
MeSH terms
Female, Femur, Humans, Knee Joint, Male, Phenotype, Retrospective Studies, Tibia, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Control Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review