Functional knee phenotypes of OA patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty are significantly more varus or valgus than in a non‐OA control group
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to analyse the coronal alignment of a large population of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty using a modern classification of the knee phenotypes found in a population of non-osteoarthritic individuals. Methods Five hundred and four navigated total knee arthroplasties were included in the OA group. The following angles were measured with a computer image-free navigation system: mechanical femorotibial angle measured on the medial side without stress and with maximum manual stress to reduce deformation, and medial distal femoral mechanical angle. The native medial distal femoral and medial proximal tibial angles (coronal orientation of the femoral or tibial joint line after correction of wear) were calculated. The data were analysed as categorical data. These data were then compared with those published in a non-arthritic population, considered as a control non-OA group. The main criterion was the percentage of subjects with normal overall coronal alignment, defined by the association of a normal native medial distal femoral angle and a normal native medial proximal tibial angle. The secondary criteria were the percentages of subjects with normal medial femorotibial mechanical angle, normal native medial distal femoral angle and normal native medial proximal tibial angle. The influence of gender on primary and secondary criteria in the study group was analysed. The most frequent phenotypes in the study group were identified. Results N…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It remains unknown if imageless intraoperative robotic data can accurately describe CPAK parameters.
“The ability of CT-based robotics to define constitutional alignment and CPAK has been established [16–18], yet it remains unknown if imageless intraoperative robotic data can accurately describe CPAK parameters [19–23].”
From Imageless robotic total knee arthroplasty determines similar coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) parameters to long leg radiographs (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Edelstein, A. I., Orsi, A. D., Plaskos, C., Coffey, S., & Suleiman, L. I. (2024) · Arthroplasty · doi:10.1186/s42836-024-00231-9 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“The ability of CT-based robotics to define constitutional alignment and CPAK has been established [16–18], yet it remains unknown if imageless intra-operative robotic data can accurately describe CPAK parameters [19–23].”
Background
- Authors
- Jenny, J., Baldairon, F., & Hirschmann, M. T.
- Affiliations
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR)
- University of Basel (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Jenny, Jean‐Yves
- Venue
- Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-08-11
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2609-2616
- ISSN
- 0942-2056 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7347
- OpenAlex
- W3188519661
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 8.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
- Keywords
- knee osteoarthritis, total knee arthroplasty, coronal alignment, genu varum, genu valgum, femorotibial angle, distal femoral angle, proximal tibial angle, computer-assisted navigation, gender differences, reference population comparison, mechanical axis deviation, posterior tibial slope
- MeSH terms
- Female, Femur, Humans, Knee Joint, Male, Phenotype, Retrospective Studies, Tibia, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Control Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review