The coronal plane alignment of the knee classification does not correlate with the functional knee phenotype classification
Abstract
Purpose It is now well established that the coronal anatomy of the lower limb is highly variable both in non-arthritic subjects and subjects undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Two new classifications were recently described independently, but never compared: functional knee phenotypes classification and coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification. The hypothesis of this study was that there was a significant difference between the values of the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) measures in the same patient at the time of TKA. Methods Five hundred and twenty cases were randomly selected among patients operated on for a TKA with navigation assistance. Anatomical parameters were collected during surgery by a navigation system, and the corresponding data of the CPAK classification were calculated. The numerical values of measured HKA and aHKA in the same patient were compared. Results The measured HKA had a mean of 3.0° varus (standard deviation of 6.0°). The calculated aHKA had a mean of 1.8° varus (standard deviation 4.8°). There was a significant difference between the values of the two measurements in the same subject (p = 0.005) and a weak negative correlation between the values of the two measurements in the same subject. In addition, there was no relationship between HKA values and joint line obliquity values or CPAK class. Conclusion A significant difference and a weak correlation between the values of the HKA a…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It remains unknown if imageless intraoperative robotic data can accurately describe CPAK parameters.
“The ability of CT-based robotics to define constitutional alignment and CPAK has been established [16–18], yet it remains unknown if imageless intraoperative robotic data can accurately describe CPAK parameters [19–23].”
From Imageless robotic total knee arthroplasty determines similar coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) parameters to long leg radiographs (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Edelstein, A. I., Orsi, A. D., Plaskos, C., Coffey, S., & Suleiman, L. I. (2024) · Arthroplasty · doi:10.1186/s42836-024-00231-9 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jenny, J., & Baldairon, F.
- Affiliations
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Jenny, Jean‐Yves
- Venue
- Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-03-22
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3906-3911
- ISSN
- 0942-2056 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-7347
- OpenAlex
- W4353016730
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 7.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Keywords
- total knee arthroplasty, coronal plane alignment of the knee, hip-knee-ankle angle, coronal alignment, joint line obliquity
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Knee, Knee Joint, Phenotype, Retrospective Studies, Tibia, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Lower Extremity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review